Question on triangometry which one we measure ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter r-soy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring the width of a river using trigonometry, specifically addressing the distance A versus distance B. It is emphasized that measuring straight across (A) is the most logical approach, as opposed to the diagonal (B), which is not the shortest distance. The conversation highlights that while both distances can be calculated, only A represents the actual width of the river. The importance of practical measurement methods is underscored, suggesting that common sense should guide the approach. Ultimately, the consensus is that for accurate width measurement, A is the preferred choice.
r-soy
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
see the pic

[PLAIN]http://store2.up-00.com/Oct10/opW54159.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
She measures 100 m long the bank, and the angle of 35 degrees. Then concludes the distance A using trigonometry. Does that answer your question? If B were required, that could also be done with trigonometry, but it wouldn't be the shortest distance, which most people would be interested in.
 
This is really just common sense... If asked to measure the width of say, a pencil, you don't start from the left bottom corner of the pencil and measure up to the top right corner, you measure straight across.
 
The caption on the picture says "To measure The wide of river we measure A or B" Your picture doesn't show it, but the width of the river seems to be A, and we walk 100 m along the river bank. Unless we are able to walk across the river, we don't measure its width (A) or the length of the diagonal (B). These are calculated values, not measured values.
 
thanks
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top