Question regarding certain standard integrals.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of certain standard integrals involving logarithmic functions. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the relationship between two integrals and their logarithmic forms, specifically questioning the sign change in the logarithmic expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to reconcile two integral expressions and questions why a negative sign appears in one logarithmic form compared to the other. Participants explore the implications of absolute values in logarithmic functions and their effects on the results.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided insights regarding the importance of absolute values in logarithmic expressions. The original poster acknowledges this clarification and reflects on the limitations of their textbook, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that their textbook lacks clarity on the use of absolute values in logarithmic integrals, which may have contributed to their confusion.

Salt
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



OK, this is something that stumped me.

Homework Equations



[itex]\int_{}^{}{\frac{dZ}{ A^{2}-Z^{2}}} = - \int_{}^{}{\frac{dZ}{ Z^{2}-A^{2} }}[/itex]

Right?

[itex]\int_{}^{}{\frac{dZ}{ A^{2}-Z^{2} }}=\; \frac{1}{2A}\ln \left\{ \frac{A+Z}{A-Z} \right\}+\mbox{C}[/itex]

[itex]\int_{}^{}{\frac{dZ}{ Z^{2}-A^{2} }}=\; \frac{1}{2A}\ln \left\{ \frac{Z-A}{Z+A} \right\}+\mbox{C}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



But I don't see how,

[itex]\frac{1}{2A}\ln \left\{ \frac{A+Z}{A-Z} \right\}+\mbox{C} = - \frac{1}{2A}\ln \left\{ \frac{Z-A}{Z+A} \right\}+\mbox{C}[/itex]

It should be,

[itex]\frac{1}{2A}\ln \left\{ \frac{A+Z}{A-Z} \right\}+\mbox{C} = - \frac{1}{2A}\ln \left\{ \frac{A-Z}{A+Z} \right\}+\mbox{C}[/itex]

No?

I derived both (OK one of them; the other I just read from the textbook), the integrations "check out", but I don't understand why!? Why the term inside "ln" is "multiplied by -1"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the integral actually comes out as the logarithm of the absolute value of something. So regardless of whether it is Z-A or A-Z, the two values will give the same answer; i.e. it doesn't matter which way around they are. (Remember there is no ln(-1).)
 
Are you forgetting the absolute value?
[tex]\int \frac{1}{z}dz= ln|z|+ C[/tex]
NOT ln z+ C unless you are sure z is positive.
 
Nytik said:
Well, the integral actually comes out as the logarithm of the absolute value of something. So regardless of whether it is Z-A or A-Z, the two values will give the same answer; i.e. it doesn't matter which way around they are. (Remember there is no ln(-1).)

HallsofIvy said:
Are you forgetting the absolute value?
[tex]\int \frac{1}{z}dz= ln|z|+ C[/tex]
NOT ln z+ C unless you are sure z is positive.

Oh ... that would explain it.

My textbook didn't put the absolute value brackets**. -_-

Thanks.

**Ya, it's not the best book, quite a few obvious typos, but it's easy enough to read. Should really get a more rigorous and accurate "second opinion" ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K