Question regarding ideal fluids vs. non-ideal fluids

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Makarov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluids
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of ideal versus non-ideal fluids, particularly in the context of blood flow in blood vessels. Participants explore the implications of changes in pipe diameter on pressure and fluid dynamics, addressing both theoretical models and biological applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that in an ideal fluid, increasing the cross-sectional area of a pipe leads to increased pressure on the walls, while decreasing the area results in decreased pressure, but expresses confusion regarding non-ideal fluids.
  • Another participant challenges this conclusion, suggesting that non-ideal fluids behave differently due to particle interactions and volume, indicating that blood cannot be treated as an ideal fluid.
  • A different participant introduces Poiseuille flow, noting that for constant volume flow, increasing pipe diameter would decrease pressure against the walls due to reduced fluid velocity.
  • Another participant provides a mathematical perspective, explaining that for a given mass flux, a larger pipe diameter results in a smaller velocity and subsequently a lower pressure drop, emphasizing the relationship between diameter and pressure drop in fluid dynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between pipe diameter and pressure in ideal versus non-ideal fluids. There is no consensus on the correct interpretation of these dynamics, particularly in the context of blood flow.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of applying ideal fluid dynamics to biological systems like blood flow, noting the importance of factors such as viscosity and shear-thinning behavior in non-ideal fluids.

Makarov
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I understand that in an ideal fluid, when the cross-sectional area of the pipe is increased, the pressure that the fluid exerts on the walls of the pipe also increases. Also, when the cross-sectional area of the pipe is decreased, the pressure that the fluid exerts on the walls of the pipe decreases.

However, I am a little confused as the how a non-ideal fluid works. Is it the other way around? When the radius of the pipe is decreased, the total peripheral resistance increases, and the pressure on the walls of the pipe rises?

The reason I am asking this question is because I am studying about the blood vessels of the body. Whenever the blood pressure rises, the body causes the vessels to dialate in order to counteract the increase in pressure and keep it constant. This seems to be contrary to what I want to think (increase in radius = increase in pressure). Is my conclusion about non-ideal fluids correct?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We assume that the particles within the ideal fluid do not interact and that their volume is negligible. It's not the same in reality, but there is not much deviation (of course, there are some limits). So, many non-ideal fluids act almost the same as the ideal model. So, your conclusion is not quite correct.

You have completely different example with the blood vessels. We cannot ignore the volume of the blood cells and their collisions, so it can't be considered as an ideal fluid. Therefore, some fluid mechanics laws cannot be applied here.

That's my assumption. I'm not sure if it's correct.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure what you mean. In Poiseuille flow, there's several parameters- the pressure drop along the pipe, the diameter of the pipe, viscosity of the fluid, etc. I would expect that keeping the volume flow constant, increasing the pipe diameter will decrease the pressure exerted against the wall because the fluid velocity goes down.

Blood is a shear-thinning fluid; the larger the shear rate, the less viscous the fluid. Also, blood pressure can change due to changes in blood volume in addition to vasoconstriction/vasodilation.
 
Consider a flow through a pipe having a diameter D.
For a given mass flux, a bigger passage area means smaller velocity.
Let me call G the mass flux (dm/dt), and V the velocity.
So:

G = \rho V S --> V = G / (\rho S)

The pressure drop due to the friction against the pipe walls is given by:

\Deltap = 1/2 f (L/D) (V^2)/g

Now, let me simplify both equations (because I understand that you're more interested in qualitative explanation) by saying that:

V \propto (G / S)

\Deltap \propto (L/D) V^2

S \propto D^2

Combine these and you obtain that ("\propto" means "proportional to"):

\Deltap \propto L (G^2) / (D^5)

or, for a fixed G:

\Deltap \propto L/(D^5)

So, if you want to decrease the pressure drop and mantain the flow rate of the fluid, you have to either decrease the length of the pipe or to increase it's diameter. That's why our body behaves in a way you have described.

Somewhere in the middle of it there are coefficients and constants like gravity "g", friction factor "f" and some other stuff, but the qualitative explanation is just like that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K