How is Maximum Sustained Speed Calculated for a Car Driving Up an Incline?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter daniellionyang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the calculation of maximum sustained speed for a car driving up a 30-degree incline, as presented in a physics exam problem. Participants explore the assumptions made in the problem regarding friction and its effects on the forces acting on the vehicle.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the solution ignores friction when calculating the force component parallel to the incline, suggesting that it should include both gravitational and frictional forces.
  • Another participant clarifies that the vehicle is rolling, not sliding, which implies a different treatment of friction.
  • There is a discussion about whether friction can be ignored in rolling without slipping, with one participant asserting that it does not affect the net force in this context.
  • Some participants note that the problem's assumptions are designed to simplify the learning process, which may not reflect real-world scenarios.
  • Questions arise about scenarios where friction should not be ignored, particularly in cases with low static friction that could affect the maximum velocity.
  • One participant emphasizes that static friction does not slow the car down and distinguishes it from rolling resistance and air drag, which are also ignored in the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of friction in the problem. While some agree that the problem's assumptions allow for ignoring friction, others question the validity of these assumptions in broader contexts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of friction in real-world applications.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumptions made in the problem statement, such as ignoring frictional losses and the conditions under which static friction is considered sufficient to prevent slipping. The discussion highlights the dependence on these assumptions for the validity of the solution.

daniellionyang
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
This is from the 2014 F=ma exam:
The maximum torque output from the engine of a new experimental car of mass m is τ. The maximum rotational speed of the engine is ω. The engine is designed to provide a constant power output P. The engine is connected to the wheels via a perfect transmission that can smoothly trade torque for speed with no power loss. The wheels have a radius R, and the coefficient of static friction between the wheels and the road is μ.

What is the maximum sustained speed v the car can drive up a 30 degree incline? Assume no frictional losses and assume μ is large enough so that the tires do not slip.

The solution is as follows:
The fundamental idea is P = Fv where F is the component of the weight parallel to the incline. Then
v = P/mg sin θ Since θ = 30◦, the answer is v = 2P/mg.

Why does the solution ignore the effects of friction when calculating F. Shouldn't F=mgsin(theta)+mu*Fn?
Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-12-22 at 6.38.07 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-12-22 at 6.38.07 PM.png
    72.6 KB · Views: 546
Physics news on Phys.org
The vehicle is rolling up the hill, not sliding up it.
 
So, in rolling without slipping, even if there is friction, we ignore it? (this means it doesn't affect the net force right?)
 
It depends on exactly what/where the friction is, but either way, in this case you were instructed to ignore it. The assumptions provided to you may or may not reflect how such problems are done in the real world: they are done to make it easier for you to solve the problem when you are learning it.
 
Thanks! You mentioned that we ignore it "in this case." Are there any cases where we do not ignore this friction?
 
daniellionyang said:
Thanks! You mentioned that we ignore it "in this case." Are there any cases where we do not ignore this friction?
The friction between the wheels and road? The problem states the criteria for why in this case it could be ignored. Flip that over...
 
daniellionyang said:
So, in rolling without slipping, even if there is friction, we ignore it? (this means it doesn't affect the net force right?)

I'm wondering if you misunderstand something... The friction mentioned in this problem is "static friction between the wheels and the road". Static friction doesn't act to slow the car down. Are you confusing this with rolling resistance or air drag?

The problem statement says two separate things..
daniellionyang said:
Assume no frictional losses...

They mean ignore things like friction in the transmission, rolling resistance and air drag etc. Those would affect the net force on the car.

...and assume μ is large enough so that the tires do not slip.

You want high static friction between a tyre and the road to stop the wheels spinning. This is why drag racers like a nice sticky surface. If μ was low (eg ice) you would have to calculate if the static friction limited the amount of torque that could be applied at the wheels. In that case the max velocity would be slower or even zero... or even negative..

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K