Question regarding pressure and energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter GabrielLight
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Pressure
AI Thread Summary
Pressure, measured in units like atm and pascals, cannot be directly converted to energy, which is expressed in joules or watts, due to their dimensional differences. While pressure can be associated with energy per unit volume, it requires a volume change to perform work, as seen in the relationship P.V = W. Power, measured in watts, represents the rate of energy generation and is distinct from static energy. The discussion emphasizes that without a change in volume, pressure alone cannot produce energy output. Thus, pressure and energy remain fundamentally different in their application and conversion.
GabrielLight
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm referring to pressure as in atm, pascals and PSI, and energy as in joules or watts.

Can pressure be converted to energy in some way? I'm aware of the existence of "pressure energy", which is joules per volume, but it's not what I mean.

For example, if a pressure of 100,000 atm is exerted on a man with a surface area of 1.8m², could we somehow translate the pressure to watts/m², without violating fluid dynamics? Or are pressure and energy not related in this form?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pressure and energy are dimensionally different, so there is certainly no conversion from one to the other.
(You mention Watts, but that is a unit of power, which is different again.)
To get an energy from a pressure you need, in effect, a volume to multiply it by. That arises directly in the gas laws, e.g. pV constant at constant temperature. In Bernoulli's equation for incompressible flow we also find a p/ρ term, which we can think of as an energy per unit mass which somehow results from the pressure, p.

Can you explain more why you ask, or why you feel it should be possible?
 
If you apply a force in a body of volume V, in its area surface A, the body experiences a pressure P=F.A that acts in it in order to peform one or more of this actions, such as a. expanding, b.contracting, c. deforming, d.heating, etc. In all cases, the P.V = W, that is the work done on the body. Knowing that W = K - Ko, you can see this relation. The pressure of a certain volume hot steam in a piston is the source of generating kinetic motion...you can also use the steam to rotate the stems of a mill, etc.
 
GabrielLight said:
I'm referring to pressure as in atm, pascals and PSI, and energy as in joules or watts.

Can pressure be converted to energy in some way? I'm aware of the existence of "pressure energy", which is joules per volume, but it's not what I mean.

For example, if a pressure of 100,000 atm is exerted on a man with a surface area of 1.8m², could we somehow translate the pressure to watts/m², without violating fluid dynamics? Or are pressure and energy not related in this form?

Thanks in advance.
I'm surprised this didn't get a more direct response:

Pressure has units of energy per unit volume and can be thought of in that way. But Watts are power, not energy. Energy is static, whereas power is rate of energy generation. So no, you can't take a static form of energy and have it continuously output power. It needs to be changing.
 
haruspex said:
Pressure and energy are dimensionally different, so there is certainly no conversion from one to the other.
Actually, pressure has units of energy per unit volume, which makes it useful in situations such as Bernoulli's equation.
 
Lukeblackhill said:
the P.V = W, that is the work done on the body
Not quite. The work done is P.dV, i.e. there has to be a change in volume.
russ_watters said:
But Watts are power, not energy.
I did point that out in post #2.
russ_watters said:
Actually, pressure has units of energy per unit volume, which makes it useful in situations such as Bernoulli's equation.
That does not contradict what I wrote. It still leaves pressure and energy dimensionally different, just as energy and power are dimensionally different. In the one case the ratio is a volume, in other, time.

The OP explicitly stated that a direct conversion was sought, not pressure as energy per volume.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top