Question regarding quadratic-like residues in (Z/pZ) .

  • Thread starter Thread starter zack_vt
  • Start date Start date
zack_vt
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Question regarding quadratic-like residues in (Z/pZ).

Hi all.

I'm working in the set that is formed by extending the integers mod p (p is prime and equal to 3 mod 4) by including i = \sqrt{-1}: (Z/pZ). I want to know if the exists a 'z' in (Z/pZ) for a given non-zero element 'a' of Z/pZ such that 'a = z\overline{z}'. If anyone could point me in a fruitful direction on this I would be most grateful.

-Z
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You're basically asking if a is the sum of two squares in Z/pZ. This is true even if p != 3 mod 4. Try to mimic the proof of the fact that a prime = 1 mod 4 is the sum of two squares in Z.

For related material, you can try reading up on "formally real fields". (Z/pZ is a nonexample.)
 


Many thanks!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top