Question regarding speed of light

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the theoretical implications of particles exceeding the speed of light. It is established that, according to relativity, no object with mass can reach light speed, and at relativistic speeds, time slows down for the moving object while its mass increases. Photons, being massless, can travel at light speed, but particles can exceed light speed in certain media without significant time effects. The concept of infinite mass arises when discussing speeds greater than light, suggesting such particles would not remain as matter. Overall, while time for a particle remains consistent, comparisons with stationary observers indicate it may appear to travel backward in time.
pamichel
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

As an amatuer but curious student of physics I am asking this question. If a particle moves at a speed greater than the speed of light, then what happens (if at all anything happens) to the time dimension in consideration to that of the particle.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I'd imagine if a particle went faster than the speed of light, it would go backward in time. But, you can't go faster than the speed of light so what do I know?
 
pamichel said:
Hello everyone,

As an amatuer but curious student of physics I am asking this question. If a particle moves at a speed greater than the speed of light, then what happens (if at all anything happens) to the time dimension in consideration to that of the particle.
Hi, pamichel;
Welcome aboard. The area that you're asking about is entirely theoretical. Relativity firmly shows that no object with mass can reach the speed of light in vacuum. At 'relativistic speeds' (fast enough for the differences to show on an instrument), the objective time will slow just as the mass will increase and the length shorten. From a subjective reference point, nothing changes. So in answer to your question as written, the only particles that could qualify for the test are photons (and possibly gravitons if such exist). Being massless, light speed is the only one that they're capable of.
Keep in mind, though, that many things can exceed the speed of light in a refractive medium. You could therefore have a highly energetic set of particles such as fast neutrons breaking the speed of light in water or glass or whatever. Their time does not seem to be significantly effected.
 
Nothing can be said though , the mass increases with velocity and at velocity greater than that of light, it would possesses infinite mass (which even Universe fails to possess).

Personally asking , what do you mean by 'zero' mass of photon when it is at rest? , it means it does not exist at rest , similarily inifnite mass is as unusual as the existence of photon at rest.

As the particle reaches the velocities near to that of velocity of light , it starts becoming a sort of energy , and at velocities greater than 'c' , it would become an 'infinite mass' meaning it would become a form of tremendous energy and will not remain matter.

Time for that particle would remain the same, but when the particle's time is compared with other's at rest/minimal velocities, its time would appear to be slower , infact slower than minimal possible slowing rate, leading to possibility that it just may be traveling reverse in time.

BJ
 

Similar threads

Back
Top