Question regarding supernovae shock breakout

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics Dad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shock Supernovae
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the shock breakout of supernovae, specifically which types of stars exhibit the strongest shock breakout and the underlying reasons. Red Super-giants (RSGs) are suggested as candidates due to their significant kinetic energy related to stellar mass and thermal energy linked to temperature and radius. Research indicates that a 25 solar mass RSG can achieve energy levels around 20 x 10^51 erg, with peak temperatures of approximately 5 x 10^5 K and luminosities near 200 x 10^44 erg/s, although these values decline for stars of different masses. The conversation also touches on the influence of mass and metallicity on shock breakout characteristics. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for astrophysical studies of supernovae.
Physics Dad
Messages
54
Reaction score
1
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no Homework Template is shown
Hi,

I am currently studying for a masters in Astrophysics and am in my Stellar Atmospheres module.

One of the questions I have been asked is with regards to the shock breakout of supernovae.

Basically, the question is which type of stars show the strongest shock breakout and why?

My thinking on this is that it is Red Super-giants as effectively the kinetic energy is a function of stellar mass the thermal energy is a function of temperature and stellar radius.

I have seen some papers showing energy levels in the range of 20 x 1051 erg, peak temperature around 5 x 105 K and peak luminosity around 200 x 1044 erg/s for a 25MΘ RSG, and these values seem to drop off either side of this mass.

The simple fact though is that I don't full understand why.

Could anyone help shed some light on this?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics Dad said:
Basically, the question is which type of stars show the strongest shock breakout and why?
Isn't it a question of mass and metalicity?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova has a table: Core collapse scenarios by mass and metallicity
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top