Question: what exactly is a singularity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter C.Braestrup
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Singularity
AI Thread Summary
A singularity refers to a point in mathematics where a function behaves erratically, often returning infinity, such as in the case of f(x) = 1/x at x=0. In the context of black holes, singularities occur at the center where general relativity's equations break down, indicating an incomplete physical theory. The event horizon surrounding a black hole is crucial, as it is observable and provides insights into the black hole's properties, while the singularity itself remains enigmatic. Additionally, singularities can also appear in models of an expanding universe, particularly when the scale factor approaches zero, but these points lack physical significance. Theoretical constructs like naked singularities, which lack event horizons, could enhance our understanding of singularities, though their existence is considered unlikely.
C.Braestrup
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
hi!, just wondered what exactly is a singularity?
yes i could google it, but i figured you guys were smarter.
on forehand, thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
In general, a singularity is the concept of a mathematical function returning an infinity or some other misbehaviour. The mathematical definition is explained well at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Singularity.html" .

For example, the function f(x) = 1/x 'is singular', i.e. has a singularity, at x=0.

Now, I assume however (correct me if I'm wrong) that you are asking your question in relation to Black Holes? In this case, the solution to the equations of General Relativity that describe Black Holes 'goes singular' at r=0 (where r is the radius from the centre of the Black Hole). What this almost certainly means is that the physical theory (in this case GR) is incomplete, and the fact that the solution contains a singuarity is strong evidence for that. That means you should not think of 'the singularity' of a black hole as being some object with some property. The fact is our equations don't work there, so we just don't know what goes on.

Fortunately, when it comes to black holes what is really important is the event horizon that surrounds the hole. Our equations do behave sensibly here, and we have observed things consistent with the existence of event horizons. Since anything that travels past this horizon cannot be observed again, it doesn't matter what goes on in the middle, as far as we know. Of course we'd still love to know the details, and this is in part the kind of problems that so called 'unified' theories of physics are hoping to one day solve.

Note that there is also a singularity in the solutions to GR for an expanding universe. This one occurs when the scale factor, a(t) (roughly speaking the relative size of the Universe as a function of time), goes to a=0 at some t. In the same way, this should not be thought of as having physical significance, even though it is very common to wrongly assert that this represents the moment of the 'Big Bang'. In fact it once again tells us our equations break down before we get to a=0, so that what we only know what happened back until a time when a(t) has a very small, but non-zero value. Extrapolating further to the a=0 point has no physical justification.

Once again, this is a shortcoming that is being actively worked on by many people, with various different extensions to current theories being examined.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thankyou, alot! you saved my day!
 
Also of note are the so called "naked singularities". These are theoretical objects that are singularities, but due to certain properties they possesses (e.g. angular momentum) do not have an event horizon. At no point near the singularity is there an area beyond which light cannot escape. If such objects exists, they would be of great use to our understanding of singularities since they would be the only singularities we could observe. These naked singularities are very odd, and as such, the likelihood of them existing is small.
 
again, thanks
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top