What Is the Correct Term for an Astronomy Lab Without Its Own Telescopes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DHF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Labs
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on naming a research facility that analyzes astronomical data without having observational equipment. Participants suggest that calling it an "observatory" may lead to confusion, as traditional observatories typically have telescopes or similar devices. A more accurate term could be "Research Institute," which reflects the facility's focus on data analysis rather than observation. The NASA Advanced Supercomputing Division is cited as an example of a similar facility that supports various projects. The naming is crucial for the story's character development, as she transitions from research to teaching roles.
DHF
Messages
247
Reaction score
32
Hello, I am doing research for a story but my question pertains directly to Astronomy so I felt it fit here better than the sci-fi board.

The main character is an Astronomer who works in a lab that receives data from the Dish in Parkes Australia. The lab she works at does not have a telescope or any observation devices, they simply comb through the data sent from other observatories.

The question is: what would her facility be called? is it still referred to as an observatory even though they don't have a dish or optical scope? All the research I have done so far returns with links to classic observatories. Is there a specific name for a lab like this?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think calling a facility an observatory will be open to criticism if it does not at least have some teaching grade equipment for making rudimentary observations. Combine some teaching grade observational equipment with world-class analyzing capabilities and the name "observatory" seems much more palatable.
 
That was my thought, I don't want it confused with an observatory. I was hoping there was a more specific name for a facility that does not have observational equipment. This is important to the story because the character starts off in a research field and soon discovers that she enjoys teaching so moves to an observatory and later takes a position teaching at a university.
 
Why not just "Research Institute"?
 
That is pretty much what I have been referring to it as. I just didn't know if there was a more specific title. I didnt want to call it an observatory for the reasons you mentioned.
 
We've just had an interesting thread about generation ships, but I don't think that that is the most reasonable way to colonize another planet. Fatal problems: - Crew may become chaotic and self destructive. - Crew may become so adapted to space as to be unwilling to return to a planet. - Making the planet habitable may take longer then the trip, so the ship needs to last far longer than just the journey. - Mid-flight malfunction may render the ship unable to decelerate at the destination...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...
Back
Top