Questions about Big Oh notation

  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on verifying two assertions related to Big Oh notation. The first assertion, that (\mathcal O(\epsilon))^2 equals \mathcal O(\epsilon^2), is confirmed through analysis of the function f(\epsilon) and its properties as epsilon approaches zero. The second assertion, \sqrt{1 + \mathcal O(\epsilon^2)} equating to 1 + \mathcal O(\epsilon^2), can be demonstrated using the binomial expansion. Both points are validated with mathematical reasoning, providing clarity on the behavior of functions in asymptotic notation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these relationships in algorithm analysis.
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
I'm sure I could think my way through these, but I'm sick and on a tight schedule, so I was hoping someone here could help me out. I would appreciate a verification, with or without proof, of the following assertions:

<br /> (\mathcal O(\epsilon))^2 = \mathcal O(\epsilon^2)<br />

and

<br /> \sqrt{1 + \mathcal O(\epsilon^2)} = 1 + \mathcal O(\epsilon^2)<br />

Thanks so much.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think I've managed to show the first one. Suppose f(\epsilon) = \mathcal O(\epsilon) (as \epsilon \searrow 0). Then there exists C &gt;0, \delta &gt; 0 such that 0 &lt; \epsilon &lt; \delta implies

<br /> \left| \frac{f(\epsilon)}{\epsilon} \right| \leq C.<br />

To show that (\mathcal O(\epsilon))^2 = \mathcal O(\epsilon^2), one simply observes that

<br /> \left| \frac{f^2(\epsilon)}{\epsilon^2} \right| \leq C^2.<br />
 
The second approximation can be gotten by using the binomial expansion of the left side.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top