Schools Questions about edX (opencourseware) on college resume?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ascendant78
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    College Resume
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the value of opencourseware (OCW) from platforms like edX, particularly regarding its impact on college resumes and graduate school applications. Participants express skepticism about the legitimacy of edX certifications, suggesting that colleges do not typically recognize them as valid credentials. It is advised that only courses taken for credit at a university should be included on a resume, as these carry more weight than audited online courses. While OCW can enhance learning and provide different perspectives, it should not replace formal education. The importance of having courses like linear algebra on a college transcript is emphasized, as this is crucial for physics majors aiming for graduate school. Overall, while OCW can supplement education, it is recommended to focus on traditional coursework for official academic records.
Ascendant78
Messages
327
Reaction score
0
This coming semester, the only courses I have left to finish my AA are Calc III, Physics II, and ODE. So, I figured I would take some additional opencourseware since I will have the spare time. On that note, I was hoping some of you might give me insight into some questions I had regarding opencourseware from edX that awards you certifications on completion:

1. Is it worth earning the certifications on edX or just audit at your own pace? Do colleges really consider those types of "badges" to have any accreditation at all?

2. Tying into question 1, is it worth putting completed opencourseware on your college resume for grad schools? If so, should it only be ones you can back up with certifications? For example, I took MIT's physics 8.01 in conjunction with my college's course to complement it, but only audited it (no cert.). Should things like that be added to the resume?

3. I know for physics majors, grad schools like to see linear algebra, which is one of the courses I plan to take on edX soon. Would that be acceptable as having learned it, or should I have the course on my college transcript?

Anyway, I know regardless of what grad schools think of it, the OCW is a great addition to my education. It's always great seeing courses from another perspective where there are different focuses. The MIT OCW is also far more comprehensive than my college's courses. I'm just wondering what would be the best way to display that additional education to grad schools?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) No. Colleges in general don't consider them valid.
2) No. Courses that you took at your university are all you need for your transcript.
3) Have it on your transcript (actually take it at your university). Like #1 said, colleges don't consider online courses very reliable.

OCW is a great supplement to your education, don't let it replace it. While it's great in concept, it is not the same as actually taking a course on the material.
 
Well at this point since I'm going to a state college, OCW can't do anything but help, lol. I mean some of my professors are great, but it's still hard to compete with the MIT courses. Besides, since I have no problems getting all the material down from my courses, I figure I might as well learn as much extra as possible. But I hear what you are saying as far as not letting it replace it, that's why I am using it to complement it.

I was just hoping for some way to express my self-motivation and additional education on my resume somehow for grad schools. Though my BS will be through a university, I want to make sure they are aware that I optimized my education as much as possible even while in a state college.

I also hear what you are saying about linear algebra. I was a bit concerned about not having it on my resume myself. The reason I was hoping to just do the edX course though is I figured it would open those credit hours for other courses I could take.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top