Questions About Gravitational Waves

Ontophobe
Messages
60
Reaction score
1
1. If the Michelson-Morley experiment were to be conducted with gravitational waves instead of light waves, would the results be any different?

2. Ought we to expect the existence of "gamma" gravitational waves and "radio" and "microwave," etc. gravitational waves? In principle, could there be a "gravitational microwave background?"

3. Corollary to #2: Ought we to expect gravitational waves to undergo Doppler effects?

4. Back when we thought light moves through an ether, we hypothesized (based on the nature of light) that the ether must be something akin to a really rigid glass. We no longer believe in the ether, but we do believe in a "spatio-temporal fabric" (tomayto/tomahto) through which gravitational waves move. Given the nature of gravitational waves, to what material substance would we compare the fabric of space-time? Glass? Rubber? Water?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ontophobe said:
If the Michelson-Morley experiment were to be conducted with gravitational waves instead of light waves, would the results be any different?

Yes, you will have a very hard time finding a gravitational beam splitter and a gravitational wave mirror. You simply cannot do the MM experiment with gravitational waves as they will go right through your experimental setup.

Ontophobe said:
2. Ought we to expect the existence of "gamma" gravitational waves and "radio" and "microwave," etc. gravitational waves? In principle, could there be a "gravitational microwave background?"
Yes, gravitational waves can have different frequencies. Different frequencies of gravitational waves are predicted by different phenomena. Gravitational waves from the very early Universe would essentially probe the physics of inflation and not be due to a thermal background.

Ontophobe said:
but we do believe in a "spatio-temporal fabric"
No we don't. This is just a popularised figure of speech to describe what is really going on in the theory. The rest of this question therefore makes no sense.
 
So gravity waves aren't waves in space-time, in contrast to EM waves which are waves in a field of potentials in space-time? Space-time isn't actually a thing (albeit non-material)? With what should I replace this popularized fiction?
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top