Questions About Ruthenium 106 and Brachytherapy

  • Thread starter Thread starter mandy9008
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Ruthenium 106, used in brachytherapy, has a half-life of 1.02 years and decays to rhodium 106, which is unstable. Calculations indicate that a microgram of ruthenium 106 contains approximately 5.68 x 10^15 atoms, and after 1.02 years, about 0.368 micrograms remain. After 0.90 years, approximately 0.915 micrograms are present. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding rhodium's instability in treatment planning, as it affects dosage and treatment efficacy. Additionally, the relationship between half-life and exponential decay is crucial for accurate calculations in therapy.
mandy9008
Messages
127
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



1. Ruthenium 106 is used in brachytherapy. It has a half-life of 1.02 years. Ruthenium 106 decays by beta emission (e-) to rhodium 106. The mass of ruthenium 106 is 105.907330 u and the mass of rhodium 106 is 105.907288 u. Rhodium 106 is not a stable isotope of rhodium. Consider a microgram of ruthenium 106 inserted into the body for therapy.

How many atoms of ruthenium are in a microgram of ruthenium 106?

After 1.02 years have passed, how many micrograms of ruthenium are present in the body?

After 0.90 years have passed, how many micrograms of ruthenium are present in the body?

After six half lives have passed, how many ruthenium atoms are still present in the body from the therapy?

Write out the equation representing the beta decay (e-) of ruthenium 106.

If the electron comes off with 0.0354 MeV of energy, determine the energy of the antineutrino.

Why is it important in brachytherapy to realize that rhodium is not a stable isotope?
If rhodium were not a stable isotope what considerations must one make?

I have answered/solved most of these questions, but I am not 100% sure that they are right.

Homework Equations



N(t) = No e -t/t1/2



The Attempt at a Solution



How many atoms of ruthenium are in a microgram of ruthenium 106?
1 microgram = 10-6 g
10-6g ((6.022 x 1023 atoms/mol) / (106 g/mol)) = 5.68 x 1015 atoms

After 1.02 years have passed, how many micrograms of ruthenium are present in the body?
N(t) = No e -t/t1/2
No = 5.68 x 1015 atoms
t=1.02 yrs
t1/2=1.02 yrs

5.68 x 1015 atoms e(-1.02/1.02) = 2.09 x 1015 atoms

2.09 x 1015 atoms (106 g/mol / (6.022 x 1023 atoms/mol)) = 3.68 x 10-7g = 0.368 micrograms

After 0.90 years have passed, how many micrograms of ruthenium are present in the body?

N(t) = No e -t/t1/2
No = 5.68 x 1015 atoms
t=0.09 yrs
t1/2=1.02 yrs

5.68 x 1015 atoms e(-0.09/1.02) = 5.20 x 1015 atoms

5.20 x 1015 atoms (106 g/mol / (6.022 x 1023 atoms/mol)) = 9.15 x 10-7g = 0.915 micrograms

After six half lives have passed, how many ruthenium atoms are still present in the body from the therapy?
To find the six half lives, I divided the half life, 1.02 yrs, by 2, 6 times, giving me 0.00796875 yrs

5.68 x 1015 atoms e(-0.00796875/1.02) = 5.64 x 1015 atoms

Write out the equation representing the beta decay (e-) of ruthenium 106.
I am not sure what equation this is asking for. My guess would be for the Q factor..
Q=(mass of reactants-mass of products) c2
Q=(105.907330u - 105.907288u)c2

If the electron comes off with 0.0354 MeV of energy, determine the energy of the antineutrino.
I am not sure on this one. Could someone help me to get started, please?

Why is it important in brachytherapy to realize that rhodium is not a stable isotope?
If rhodium were not a stable isotope what considerations must one make?

I am not really sure why a stable isotope would be necessary for this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're missing a factor in the exponent. If the half-life is 1.02 years, then after 1.02 years half of the original amount will have decayed - that's why it's called a half-life. I suggest you go back and review the relation between the half-life and the exponential decay constant (usually called lambda).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Back
Top