Questions about Zhumell 3x Barlow for 12" Dobsonian Telescope

  • Thread starter Thread starter NerfMonkey
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Using a 3x Barlow with a 12" Dobsonian telescope may lead to some loss of image quality, but the extent varies by eyepiece quality. A 3x Barlow will triple the magnification but can reduce image brightness, potentially making some details less visible. It is essential to consider your current eyepiece lineup when deciding between a 2x and a 3x Barlow, as different combinations can affect your viewing experience. Eye relief remains important, and some eyepieces offer better comfort when used with a Barlow. Ultimately, the choice between a 2x and 3x Barlow depends on personal preferences and specific viewing needs.
NerfMonkey
Messages
36
Reaction score
1
Sorry to be starting a new topic yet again, hope I don't look like a post whore:

I'm thinking about buying this barlow but first I have some questions.

1) Will I be sacrificing a lot of image quality (if any) in using a 3x barlow? My scope is a 12" Dob.
2) Will the barlow simply triple the size of the image I see without it, or will it make other things visible that weren't before?
3) Is it really worth it to buy a 3x barlow rather than a 2x?

Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You need to think about your current EP line-up. I chose my EPs based partly on my choice of Barlows. If you have a 2X and a 1.5x, you've got a real mix-up depending on what EPs you choose. Make up a little spread-sheet of the available magnifications. Remember that some EPs have pretty nice eye-relief, and that this wonderful feature is still available when you've got the EP stacked in a Barlow. It makes a difference.
 
Also, for your #2, a Barlow will reduce the brightness of the image, so less things will be visible, not more.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top