Questions on Remainder & Integer Divisibility

clueles
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I have 2 questions.

1)what is the remainder with 100! is divided by 103? explain your answer

2)a = 238000 = 2^4 x 5^3 x 7 x 17 and b=299880 = 2^3 x 3^2 x 5 7^2 17. Is there an integer so that a divides b^n? if so what is the smallest possibility for n?

the first one i have no idea how to even start it and the second one i know that the prime factorization helps to find out what n is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I would start by asking what is the remainder when 102! is divided by 103. i.e. zero. Then let's see if that helps.

Since 103 is prime, then mod 103, the numbers from 1 to 102 forma multiplicative group, i.e. each has an inverse such thnat its product with that guy is 1. now there are two numbers equal to their own inverse 1 and 102 = -1. so no other number equals its own inverse. thus when we multiplky all these numbers to gether, we get -1. so the remainder of 102! is -1 mod 103. but 102! equals (102)(101)(100!),

so (102)(101)(100!) = -1 mod 103. does that help?
 
can you explain it again

i'm still confused about it. how do you get the -1. I'm sorry would you be able to explain it a different way?
 
1) have you seen Wilson's theorem? If so, mathwonk's post should look familiar

2) How do the exponents in the prime factorization tell you when one number is divisible by another? Can you answer this- does a divide b? Can you tell this just from comparing exponents?
 
The integers taken modulo any prime p form a field. 103 is prime, so \mathbb{Z}_{103} is a field. Thus, \forall x \in \mathbb{Z}_{103}, \exists x^{-1} \in \mathbb{Z}_{103} \ \mbox{s.t.} \ xx^{-1} = x^{-1}x = 1. Now, if x=1 \ \mbox{or} \ x=102 = -1, \ \mbox{then} \ x^{-1} = x \ \mbox{in} \ \mathbb{Z}_{103}. Thus when you multiply all the elements in \mathbb{Z}_{103} together, ie. take 102! = \prod_{\mathbb{Z}_{103} \ni i=1}^{102} i, you just get (102)(1) = (-1)(1) = -1, and so 102! \equiv -1 \equiv 102 \ (\mbox{mod} 103)
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top