Quick Limit Question (Pictures Included)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yawzheek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a calculus problem where the original poster is unsure if their solution or the textbook is incorrect. They share their attempt to solve the limit as w approaches -k and realize they made a mistake in their calculations. After receiving feedback, they acknowledge their error in substituting variables and confirm the correct limit is -3. Additionally, there is a reminder about the importance of using the homework template for future posts. The conversation highlights the collaborative nature of problem-solving in mathematics.
Yawzheek
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Hey all!

I'm just going back through an old calculus book I have, and while attempting one of the odd numbered problems (because I can check my answers, obviously) I came across a problem and I'm not entirely sure if I've made a serious mistake and completely goofed, or if my book is incorrect. It wouldn't be the first time, and it was a book my physics instructor gave me, and is an instructors first version several years old, but I wanted to check it with you guys. I've included a photo with my attempt. Hopefully it's clear enough to read - the limit is w as it approaches -k.

Also, I've included it in precalculus, since it's a topic often covered in the final chapters of precalculus text, or at least was in my old precalc text, and I've read the template. Trust that you're not helping me in any actual course - this is purely recreational studying, and I have made an attempt to solve it, as you'll see.
 

Attachments

  • littlehelp.png
    littlehelp.png
    40.1 KB · Views: 479
Physics news on Phys.org
You go from (w+4k)/k to (-k-4k)/k but it should be (-k+4k)/k
 
  • Like
Likes Yawzheek
Nathanael said:
You go from (w+4k)/k to (-k-4k)/k but it should be (-k+4k)/k

Oh dear God, Nathanael, I think I see what I did now, thank you! Unbelievable! I'm such an idiot...

(w+4k)/w ---> (-k+4k)/-k ---> 3k/-k = -3

I replaced the k in the second term of the numerator with w, and then replaced THAT with -k. I guess it would have been correct, had the equation been (w+4w)/k , but it wasn't, and for WHATEVER reason I arbitrarily attached a negative to the initial k.

Thanks man! Appreciate it!
 
@Yawzheek, I notice that you didn't use the homework template. In future posts, please don't delete it, as its use is required in homework posts.
 
Mark44 said:
@Yawzheek, I notice that you didn't use the homework template. In future posts, please don't delete it, as its use is required in homework posts.

My apologies, sir. I deleted it because I assumed the photograph, coupled with my attempt to solve the question and explanation would be sufficient.

Again, I'm very sorry for that.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top