Quick pH calculation - Please verify

  • Thread starter Thread starter alingy1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation Ph
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the new pH after adding sulfuric acid to a sodium hydroxide solution. Initially, the sodium hydroxide solution has a pH of 12.50, and upon adding 36.00 mL of 0.0200 mol/L sulfuric acid, the calculations show that the limiting reagent is sulfuric acid, which is fully consumed. After the reaction, 0.00014 mol of hydroxide ions remain, leading to a total solution volume of 86 mL. The final calculated pH of the resulting solution is 11.21, confirming the accuracy of the calculations. The discussion concludes with a request for verification of the method used to arrive at the pH.
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
Quick pH calculation -- Please verify

A 50.0 mL aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide has a pH of 12.50. If 36.00 ml of 0.0200 mol/L sulfuric acid is added to this sodium hydroxide solution, what will be the new pH of the resulting solution? Assume that the temperature stays constant at 25C, and that the volumes are perfectly additive.

50ml=0.05L
0.00158 mol OH- initially.
0.00072 mol H2SO4
Entire consumption of H2SO4(limiting reagent).
0.00086 mol OH- left.
0.00072 mol HSO4- left.
Entire consumption of HSO4-:
0.00014 mol OH- left.
Volume total=86 ml.
ph=11.21


Makes sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK.
 
How did you do all of it?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top