Quick question about inequality notation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct use of inequality and equality notation when x equals 4. Both provided expressions, n ≤ 3x² ≤ 48 and n ≤ 3x² = 48, are deemed correct, though the latter is more commonly used. The necessity of switching from inequality to equality depends on context and writing style, with multiple comparison symbols often acceptable in mathematical writing. It is clarified that "A or B" is true if either condition holds, and that while precision is important, both forms can convey the same truth. Ultimately, clarity in mathematical notation is essential for effective communication.
quark1005
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Which of the following is correct, if x = 4?

n\leq3x^{2}

\leq3(4)^{2}

\leq48

or

n\leq3x^{2} =3(4)^{2} =48

In other words, in what situations is it necessary to switch from inequality to equality, and it is always required to have only one comparison symbol per line?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
quark1005 said:
In other words, in what situations is it necessary to switch from inequality to equality, and it is always required to have only one comparison symbol per line?
It really depends on your writing style. Every maths textbook I've seen puts multiple comparison symbols per line, so it's not a big deal if you do so.
 
"A or B" is true if either A or B is true. In particular "4\le 4" means "4< 4 or 4= 4". Since the latter is true 4\le 4 is true. Of course, it is more precise to say "4 = 4" but both are true.
 
Both of your examples are correct, but the second one is the one usually seen.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top