Quick question about raising and lowering operators (ladder operators)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 4K views
PhysicsGirl90
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Reading through my QM text, I came across this short piece on ladder operators that is giving me trouble (see picture). What I am struggling with is how to get to equations 2 and 3 from equation 1.

Can someone point me in the right direction? Where does the i infront of the x go?
 

Attachments

  • Question.png
    Question.png
    11 KB · Views: 1,169
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey tiny-tim,

Thanks for your suggestion. I tried it but i get stuck trying to get the same equation as the text. I have included what i got so far in the picture. Can you give it a look and tell me what I am doing wrong?
 

Attachments

  • Attempt.png
    Attempt.png
    4.4 KB · Views: 592
This is a very sloppy "derivation" of the ladder operators. First of all
Simple algebraic factoring yields two roots
is not correct, since [itex]\hat{x}[/itex] and [itex]\hat{p}[/itex] are operators. (By the way, it should be [itex]d/dx[/itex], not [itex]d/d\hat{x}[/itex].) You can get inspiration from what algebraic factoring would give, if these were ordinary variables, in order to investigate operators that look like the roots. But [itex]a_+[/itex] and [itex]a_-[/itex] are not "derived" this way.

You can also notice that [tex]\hat{X} = \sqrt{\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}} \hat{x}[/tex] and [tex]\hat{P} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{m \hbar \omega}} \hat{p}[/tex] are dimensionless.
 
Thanks again tiny-tim and thank you DrClaude for your help