Quick Question Cons. Energy, elastic collision, projectile

AI Thread Summary
In a physics problem involving a cube sliding down a frictionless incline and colliding elastically with a smaller cube, the discussion centers on the use of mass values in calculations. Participants confirm that using symbolic representations for mass, such as m and m/2, is sufficient since the masses will cancel out in the final equations. Despite one user initially using numerical values and arriving at the correct answer, others emphasize the importance of understanding the underlying principles rather than relying solely on numbers. The final landing distances for the cubes are noted, with the larger cube landing 0.35m away and the smaller cube 1.4m away from the table. The conversation highlights the significance of conservation of energy and momentum in solving such physics problems.
0338jw
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a physics lab a cube slides down a frictionless incline and elastically strikes another cube at the bottom that is only half it's mass. If the incline is 30 cm high and the table is 90 cm off the floor where does each cube land?

Homework Equations


mgh=1/2mv^2
v=at+v_o
x=.5at^2 +v_o*t +x_0
conservation of momentum/energy

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that this problem has three parts, conservation of energy, collision and projectile but I had a question about the mass. so I simply use 2m and M or can i substitute any value in as long as it;s twice the value of the smaller block? I know how to solve all parts but this first part stumbled me a little bit. Thanks in advance, all help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't use numerical values. Call the masses m and m/2. (Or something equivalent.)

Since the actual values of the masses are not needed, the masses will drop out of any final calculation.
 
well I used numerical values, and I still got the right answer, but thanks for the advice regardless! The big block lands .35m away and the smaller one flies 1.4m away from the table.
 
0338jw said:
well I used numerical values, and I still got the right answer, but thanks for the advice regardless!
Of course you can plug in numbers, but it's much better--and easier!--to set the equations up symbolically and understand why the masses cancel out.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top