Qustions about credit hours in Physics and Math

  • Thread starter Thread starter Singlino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
In American universities, the credit hour system for undergraduate physics and math courses typically includes both lecture and recitation components within the total credit hours assigned to a course. For example, a 4-credit introductory physics course generally encompasses both lecture and recitation hours, meaning students receive credit for attending both. Recitation sections are often mandatory and contribute to the overall credit, which may not directly correlate with the number of hours a class meets each week. Additionally, lab sections may be designated separately, sometimes requiring additional credits. It's important to note that the number of credits does not always reflect the total instructional hours, as some courses may meet more frequently than the credit hours would suggest.
Singlino
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello
I have some questions about the credit hours system in physics and math undergraduate courses in the american universities since I am planning to do my undergraduate degree there

For the introductory physics sequence, what is the duration of the recitation sections which are supposed to go with the courses, and are they counted in the credit hours of the course or not?

for example an introductory physics I , say 4 credits
does that 4 mean on average 3 hours of lecture and 1 hour for recitation per week? or recitation is not counted?
(I am ignoring the lab and I am assuming that it has a separate 1 Cr say)

how about introductory math courses, i see the universities listing only calculus I 4 Cr., calculus II 4Cr...etc without any information about the recitations classes or their durations

some information would be greately appreciated
thnx

Dina
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As near as I understand, a credit or unit for a SEMESTER is for term length of 18 weeks of instruction, the number of instructional class time hours per 1 week. What I am really not sure about is how the laboratory sections relates to this. Sometimes there is a designation of "lab hours arranged", or other times "0" units (meaning credits), or still other times you will see a number of credits designated for the laboratory sections.

A simple general example is for some university Math 1000 course on a semester schedule of 4 units - This would be a math course meeting for 4 hours per week and the course lasts 18 weeks. Does it have any laboratory section? Maybe, but someone else could explain that part better.
 
ok let me rephrase my question, if an introductory physics course is for 4 Cr. say (and assume that it has a separate lab for 1 Cr must be taken as a corequisite) the question now is , those 4 Cr. are only for lecturing by the professor without including the recitation classes hours (which i assume should be something like 1 or 2 hrs per week) ?

D.
 
Singlino said:
ok let me rephrase my question, if an introductory physics course is for 4 Cr. say (and assume that it has a separate lab for 1 Cr must be taken as a corequisite) the question now is , those 4 Cr. are only for lecturing by the professor without including the recitation classes hours (which i assume should be something like 1 or 2 hrs per week) ?

D.

Uh nope. At 95% of US universities, recitation enrollment is REQUIRED in the lecture portion of the course, and since it is compulsory, the credit for it is included in the number of credit hours the lecture section gives (hence, for a 4 credit calculus lecture section, you get 4 credits for attending the lecture AND discussions together).

Oh and credits doesn't always equal how many hours a week the class meets. At my university, a class could meet for 6 hours (2 hours x 3 times a week) and still only be worth 4 credits. So the two are not always synonymous.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top