Radial expansion of the universe and the speed of light

AugustusM
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Just wondering if the two are fundamentally linked ?

If the universe is in the shape of a 3 sphere and if it's radius represents time, then does the expansion rate of the radius determine what the speed of light is ?

I've also read elsewhere that the passing of time is linked to the expansion of the universe along it's radius. If the expansion of the universe stopped, would time stop. With timed stopped would light and photons then stop moving ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AugustusM said:
Just wondering if the two are fundamentally linked ?

If the universe is in the shape of a 3 sphere and if it's radius represents time, then does the expansion rate of the radius determine what the speed of light is ?

I've also read elsewhere that the passing of time is linked to the expansion of the universe along it's radius. If the expansion of the universe stopped, would time stop. With timed stopped would light and photons then stop moving ?
Maybe it's the other way around. The speed of light might be determining how fast the universe appears (to us) to be expanding. After all, the speed of pretty much any process here on Earth (down to the speed of chemical and even atomic processes, which still depend on photons and other particles being transferred back and forth at a small scale) can probably be linked to the speed of light. If the speed of light changes, our clocks (no matter what they are made of) and our subjective perception of time will change too. If our clocks slow down (because the speed of light slows down), but the universe keeps merrily expanding at its normal rate, it will appear to be accellerating. Just a random thought...
 
Just a simple logical conclusion

1. Just say that the speed at which the radius of the universe is increase is the same as the speed of light.

2. If the universe stops expanding, then time stops.

3. If time stops, then all movement stops.

4. Even light cannot move in this scenario.

5. If the speed of light is now zero (as the universe's radial increase velocity is now zero also) then this means that light cannot move anyways.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top