Radial Force on Railway Engine of 120 Tons at 25mph

AI Thread Summary
A railway engine weighing 120 tons travels at 25 mph around a curve with a radius of 220 yards, resulting in a radial force of approximately 7.638 tons. The calculation for radial force involves dividing by the acceleration due to gravity, which clarifies the conversion from mass to weight. The angle of inclination, theta, is determined using the tangent function, but discrepancies arise in the height calculation of the outer rail. The discussion emphasizes the need for accurate unit transformations to solve the problem analytically. Overall, the focus is on understanding the forces acting on the railway engine and the necessary banking of the track.
John O' Meara
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
A railway engine of mass 120 tons travels round a curve of radius 220 yards at a speed of 25 miles per hour. Find in tons weight the radial force acting on the engine. If the resultant of the radial force and the weight of the engine acts in a direction normal to the plane of the track, and the gauge is 56.5 ins. how must the outer rail be banked up above the level of the inner rail.
66mph=88 ft/s, =>25mph=36.63 ft/s. F=ma = mv^2/r, F=244.44 tons, F= 244.44 divided by 32ft/s/s = 7.638 tons wt. where F= radial force.
Question: why divide by 32ft/s/s, I thought you multiplied the mass by the acceleration due to gravity to get the weight.
2nd part: first find the angle "theta" with which the resultant R is inclined to the vertical.
tan(theta) = 7.64/120 which give the wrong answer for theta: because 56.5"sin(theta) doesn't give you 3.6inches.Thanks guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm too lazy to make unit transformations. What I've understood from your post, this should solve the problem analitically:

Fcos(\theta) = mg
Fsin(\theta) = mv^2/r
\frac{v^2/r}{g} = tan(\theta)
atan(\frac{v^2/r}{g}) = \theta
(gauge)sin(\theta) = (height)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top