Radiation absorption by an atom

jaumzaum
Messages
433
Reaction score
33
When we shine light on an atom, it can absorbs this radiation, stimulating its electrons to jump to a more energetic energy level. This lasts too little time, and when the electrons come back to their original (fundamental) energy level, they emit the same energy they had absorbed before. This energy levels, though, are quantized. And by what I've understood, the atoms can only ABSORB and emit some discrete frequencies. So, I'm confused about the following:

Consider the hydrogen atom.
To pass from the n=1 to the n=2 energy level, we need a radiation of 13,6 (1/1² - 1/2²) = 10,2 eV.
What would happen if we shine a monochromatic light of energy hf = 10,3 eV?
Would the atom absorb that radiation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Light does not just excite atoms, it also scatters off them.
 
Bill_K said:
Light does not just excite atoms, it also scatters off them.

What does it mean?
 
Scattering is a billiard-ball collision in which some of the energy and momentum of the photon is transferred to the atom. You might take a look at this Wikipedia page.
 
Bill_K said:
Scattering is a billiard-ball collision in which some of the energy and momentum of the photon is transferred to the atom. You might take a look at this Wikipedia page.

Thank you. I've read your page about the topic, can you tell me if I understood it right?

By what I've understood, the excess of energy is absorbed by the atom, making it vibrate in different levels of vibration (rayleigh scattering). Is this right?
Are this vibration levels quantized too? By what I know so far, vibration is a type of movement that does not change the mass center of a molecule. Could this excess of energy be added to the translational or rotational energies too?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top