Radiation Far Zone Expansion - 65 Characters

decerto
Messages
84
Reaction score
2
So using the lorenz gauge and maxwells equations we find that both the scalar and vector potentials obey the wave equation with a charge/current density source.

##\Box \phi= \frac{\rho}{\epsilon} ##
##\Box\vec{A} = \mu \vec{J}##

So using the greens function for the wave equation we can compute the scalar or vector potential given either a charge or current density.

##\phi(x,t)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\int \frac{\delta(t'-[t-\frac{|x-x'|}{c}])}{|x-x'|}\rho(x,t) dt'\ d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x,t)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\int \frac{\delta(t'-[t-\frac{|x-x'|}{c}])}{|x-x'|}\vec{J}(x,t) dt'\ d^3x'##

If the charge/current densities are sinusoidally time dependent and using the retarded condition from the greens function we get a spatially oscillating term in the integral solution for the potentials, this term can then be expanded in the 'far zone'.

##\rho(x,t)=\rho(x)e^{-i\omega t}##
##\vec{A}(x,t)=\vec{A}(x)e^{-i\omega t}##

##\phi(x,t)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\int \frac{\delta(t'-[t-\frac{|x-x'|}{c}])}{|x-x'|}\rho(x')e^{-i\omega t'} dt'\ d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x,t)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\int \frac{\delta(t'-[t-\frac{|x-x'|}{c}])}{|x-x'|}\vec{J}(x')e^{-i\omega t'}dt'\ d^3x'##

##\phi(x,t)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\int \frac{1}{|x-x'|}\rho(x')e^{-i\omega( t-\frac{|x-x'|}{c})} d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x,t)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\int \frac{1}{|x-x'|}\vec{J}(x')e^{-i\omega (t-\frac{|x-x'|}{c})} d^3x'##Making the time dependence implicit

##\phi(x)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\int \frac{e^{ik|x-x'|}}{|x-x'|}\rho(x') d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\int \frac{e^{ik|x-x'|}}{|x-x'|}\vec{J}(x') d^3x'##

Far zone ##|x-x'| \approx |x|-\frac{x \cdot x'}{|x|}=r-\hat{n}\cdot x'## for exponential and ##|x-x'|=|x|=r## for the denominator

##\phi(x)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\int e^{ik\hat{n}\cdot x'}\rho(x') d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\int e^{ik\hat{n}\cdot x'}\vec{J}(x') d^3x'##

##\phi(x)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(-ik)^n}{n!}\int (\hat{n} \cdot x')^n \rho(x') d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(-ik)^n}{n!}\int (\hat{n} \cdot x')^n \vec{J}(x') d^3x'##

My questions are about these expansions, for the scalar potential expansion the 1st term gives

##\phi(x)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\int \rho(x') d^3x'##

To me this looks like a monopole wave but jackson in section 9.1 for anyone who has the book explicitly states the monopole part of the the potential is necessarily static(spatially static) by considering ##|x-x'|=r##

##\phi(x,t)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\int \frac{\delta(t'-[t-\frac{r}{c}])}{r}\rho(x,t) dt'\ d^3x'##

##\phi(x,t)=\frac{q(t'=t-\frac{r}{c})}{4\pi \epsilon}##

I don't understand where this comes from and it appears to contradict the 1st term in the expansion.

My other question is about the the second term in the scalar expansion and the first term in the vector expansion given by ##\phi(x)=\frac{-ik}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\hat{n} \cdot \int x' \rho(x') d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\int\vec{J}(x') d^3x'##

By the continuity equation and integration by parts this can be shown to be

##\vec{A}(x)=-\frac{i\omega\mu}{4\pi}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\vec{p}##
##\phi(x)=-\frac{ik}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\hat{n} \cdot \vec{p}##

with ##\vec{p}=\int x' \rho(x') d^3x'##

So there is obviously a lot of symmetry between these two equations ##\omega## and ##k##, ##\vec{p}## and ##\hat{n} \cdot \vec{p}##, ##\mu## and ##\frac{1}{\epsilon}##

Is this symmetry perserved for all paired terms in both expansions like this, what do the higher order expansion terms look like and if I did this type of expansion in covariant notation would these be the part of the same term essentially?
 
  • Like
Likes MisterX
Physics news on Phys.org
decerto said:
My questions are about these expansions, for the scalar potential expansion the 1st term gives

##\phi(x)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\int \rho(x') d^3x'##

To me this looks like a monopole wave but jackson in section 9.1 for anyone who has the book explicitly states the monopole part of the the potential is necessarily static(spatially static) by considering ##|x-x'|=r##

##\phi(x,t)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\int \frac{\delta(t'-[t-\frac{r}{c}])}{r}\rho(x,t) dt'\ d^3x'##

##\phi(x,t)=\frac{q(t'=t-\frac{r}{c})}{4\pi \epsilon}##

I don't understand where this comes from and it appears to contradict the 1st term in the expansion.

There is indeed a ##1/r## missing in the text (http://www-theory.lbl.gov/jdj/Errata(2010).pdf). It does not change the discussion about the static nature, since that just refers to the time independence.

My other question is about the the second term in the scalar expansion and the first term in the vector expansion given by##\phi(x)=\frac{-ik}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\hat{n} \cdot \int x' \rho(x') d^3x'##
##\vec{A}(x)=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\int\vec{J}(x') d^3x'##

By the continuity equation and integration by parts this can be shown to be

##\vec{A}(x)=-\frac{i\omega\mu}{4\pi}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\vec{p}##
##\phi(x)=-\frac{ik}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\hat{n} \cdot \vec{p}##

with ##\vec{p}=\int x' \rho(x') d^3x'##

So there is obviously a lot of symmetry between these two equations ##\omega## and ##k##, ##\vec{p}## and ##\hat{n} \cdot \vec{p}##, ##\mu## and ##\frac{1}{\epsilon}##

Is this symmetry perserved for all paired terms in both expansions like this, what do the higher order expansion terms look like and if I did this type of expansion in covariant notation would these be the part of the same term essentially?

The symmetry between the numerical coefficients is indeed a property of the Lorentz invariance of electrodynamics. The fact that both terms are dipoles is more a property of the multipole expansion of the Green function (9.98). The fact that the dipole comes in as the first term of the expansion of the vector potential vs the 2nd term for the scalar potential is due to the vector vs scalar nature of the objects. At higher orders, the structure is dictated by the polar symmetry of the spherical harmonics. I believe the quadropole moment is given somewhere in Ch 9. Some explicit forms for higher mulipole moments appears in http://zon8.physd.amu.edu.pl/historia/kielich-publ/129.pdf
 
What does the first term of the scalar expansion correspond to then?
 
decerto said:
What does the first term of the scalar expansion correspond to then?

It's the same static monopolar potential that you'd find if the charge configuration was static and spherically symmetric.
 
fzero said:
It's the same static monopolar potential that you'd find if the charge configuration was static and spherically symmetric.
But it has a spatially oscillating term ##e^{ikr}## and a temporal term ##e^{i\omega t}##?
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top