Reducing Radicals in Exams: Is it True?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radical
AI Thread Summary
Radicals in exams should typically be reduced when possible, similar to simplifying fractions. For example, expressing \sqrt[3]{81} as 3\sqrt[3]{3} is considered good practice. However, presenting the answer as 3^{4/3} is also acceptable unless otherwise specified. If the radical is the final answer, it is preferable to leave it in its simplified surd form. Overall, clarity and adherence to exam guidelines are key in presenting answers.
Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
With regard to examinations, is it true that radicals must typically be "reduced", if possible?

For instance, with fractions, you would hardly ever leave 4/8 as it is, but instead reduce it to 1/2.

Well let's say that durring an exam, you arrived at \displaystyle{\sqrt[3]{81}} for an answer.

Is it true that normal procedure is to instead express that as \displaystyle{3\sqrt[3]{3}} ?

Thanks a lot.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes is the answer. It's just good practice.

Though in the example you've cited expressing the answer as 3^{\frac{4}{3}} doesn't seem wrong to me.
 
Yes, expressing it still in surd form or in power form is generally fine, unless they specifically ask you do express it in some other form.

Though if it is the final step of a question, I would leave it as surd form, simplified, rather than leaving it in a power form, unless there are more calculations to follow, which require indices etc.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top