Radio astronomical receiving system

  • Thread starter Thread starter ansenko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radio System
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a radio astronomical receiving system designed for antenna systems operating within the 2-40 GHz frequency range, specifically covering Ka-band, S-band, and X-band. Participants seek clarification on the theoretical aspects of these frequency bands and ongoing research challenges. There is some confusion regarding the initial inquiry, with requests for elaboration on the specific studies related to the receiving system. The conversation also touches on potential language barriers affecting understanding. Overall, the thread highlights the need for clearer communication regarding radio astronomy research and equipment preferences.
ansenko
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
We've discussing with students the certain radio astronomical receiving system is designed for equipping the antenna systems, operating within band 2-40 GHz:
Ka - band 28-34 GHz
S - band 2.2-2.6 GHz
X - band 7.0-9.5 GHz

and provides the radio reception, amplification, selection of the operating bands of radio astronomical signals, frequency conversion and frequency-channel switching, etc.

Could somebody clarify theoretic perspective of stading of exactly those bands, problematic, ongoing researches?

Many thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I don't quite understand what you're asking. Could you elaborate on what you'd like to know?
 
Drakkith said:
I don't quite understand what you're asking. Could you elaborate on what you'd like to know?
Hello Drakkith,
So perhaps you right. Let's start from afar. What kind of radio astronomical receiving system do you prefer …for which studies?
 
ansenko said:
Hello Drakkith,
So perhaps you right. Let's start from afar. What kind of radio astronomical receiving system do you prefer …for which studies?

I don't study astronomy. I just cannot understand your question, perhaps due to translation issues.
 
Drakkith said:
I don't study astronomy. I just cannot understand your question, perhaps due to translation issues.
I see… I missed a few words. If there any possibilities to change the thread?
 
Start a new thread and I'll delete this one once the new one's made.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
4K
Back
Top