Radio Frequency Acceleration Scheme?

AI Thread Summary
The radio frequency (RF) acceleration scheme used in particle accelerators like the LHC involves sending electromagnetic (EM) waves into standing wave cavities to create an axial electric field that accelerates charged particles. The timing of particle injection into these cavities is crucial, as the fields must be synchronized to ensure particles enter at the correct phase for effective acceleration. Different accelerating structures, such as linacs, utilize multiple cavities, often made of copper or superconducting materials, to enhance acceleration efficiency. The proposed International Linear Collider will operate in specific frequency bands, such as the L-Band, around 1.3 GHz or 13 GHz. Understanding this scheme is essential for grasping the complexities of particle acceleration and bunch structure in high-energy physics.
samshort25
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I'm reading into the LHC and the "bunch structure", and I'm confused in general, and I think knowing what the radio frequency acceleration scheme is might help?! As in, how does it work? And does it actually use radio waves?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks, Samantha
 
Physics news on Phys.org
samshort25 said:
Hello!

I'm reading into the LHC and the "bunch structure", and I'm confused in general, and I think knowing what the radio frequency acceleration scheme is might help?! As in, how does it work? And does it actually use radio waves?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks, Samantha

The name "RF" is a bit misleading. For example, the proposed International Linear Collider will have accelerating structures in what is known as the "L-Band". I will guess that it will be around either 1.3 GHz, or 13 GHz.

In any case, what is done is like this. You send an EM wave into a standing wave cavity. The mode of the EM wave is in such a way that you will get an axial E-field along the axis of the cavity (such as the TM01 mode). This is the accelerating field that is responsible in accelerating the charged particle. There can be many of these structures stacked together in series. However, because it is an oscillating field, you need to do 2 things:

1. You need to know just the right timing to inject the particles into the cavities.

2. You need to have the field in each cavity to NOT be at the same phase with each other. The phase difference depends on the nature of each cavity. In any case, you need to time the entry of the charge particle just right so that as it goes into one cavity, the field is building in the right direction, and as it leave that cavity and goes into the next cavity, the field in that cavity will also start building in the right direction. How fast these fields build up has to depend on the group velocity and how fast the charge particles are moving through it.

Typical accelerating structures are called "linac", made with several cavities or cells of copper. These are what we call iris-loaded structure. The ILC will have structures made of superconducting material.

Zz.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Back
Top