Radioactive Decay: Calculate % Decayed, Atoms Remaining, Half-Life

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the percentage of a radioactive nuclide that has decayed, the number of remaining atoms, and the half-life of the nuclide. The user successfully calculated the remaining atoms as 2.976E18 using the decay formula. However, they are struggling with determining the percentage decayed and the half-life, consistently arriving at an incorrect percentage of 8.43%. Another participant suggests that the methods used are correct but hints at possible arithmetic errors, providing their own calculation of 8.46% for the percentage decayed. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate calculations in radioactive decay problems.
JstCallMeTrix
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A radioactive sample contains 3.25 1018 atoms of a nuclide that decays at a rate of 3.4 1013 disintegrations per 26 min.
(a) What percentage of the nuclide will have decayed after 159 d?
%

(b) How many atoms of the nuclide will remain in the sample?
atoms

(c) What is the half-life of the nuclide?
days

Homework Equations



The equations I used were
t1/2 = ln2/k to find the half life
and N'=Ne-kt

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the equations above and solved for part b, the number of atoms and found this to be 2.976E18 --which IS correct. I converted the 159 days into minutes, and found k by taking the rate (now in days) and dividing by the original number (N) and getting 3.836E-7 for k

I then plugged this into N*e-kt with t now in minutes and got my answer for part B. (2.976E18 atoms).

So my problem is with part 1 and 3...I thought it would be pretty straight forward, subtracting hte remaining atoms from the original to get the amount that decayed. Then taking that amount, dividing it by the original to get hte percent decayed. I keep getting 8.43% for this...but it's incorrect.

Finally for C, I thought I would just convert everything back to days, then take ln2/k (in days now) to get the half life...but I guess something is wrong here too. Can someone please explain how to do this? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your methods are correct. You could be making errors in arithmetic. For what it's worth, I get 8.46% for part (a).
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top