Radiocarbon Dating: Determining Sample Age of 41000-Yrs

  • Thread starter Thread starter blue_lilly
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the percentage of original carbon-12 atoms remaining in a 41,000-year-old sample using the radiocarbon dating formula. The initial calculations yielded an incorrect result of approximately 1.025%, which was later corrected to about 0.00702 after identifying a transcription error. Participants clarified that to convert a fraction to a percentage, one must multiply by 100, not divide. The confusion around percentage calculations led to discussions about basic mathematical principles. Ultimately, the correct percentage of remaining carbon-12 atoms is approximately 0.00702%.
blue_lilly
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The practical limit to ages that can be determined by radiocarbon dating is about 41000-yr-old sample, what percentage of the original 6 12 C atoms remains?

Homework Equations


(N1/No)=e^-λt

The Attempt at a Solution


Variables:
t = 41,000 yrs
T1/2 of Carbon = 5730 yrs
ln2 = .693

I basically plugged in the numbers and solved because you are given all the variables.
(N1/No)=e^-λt
(N1/No) = e^-(ln2/T1/2)t
(N1/No) = e^-(.693/5730 yrs)(41,000 yrs)
ln(N1/No) = -(.693/5730 yrs)(41,000 yrs)
ln(N1/No) = -(1.2094E-4)(41,000 yrs)
ln(N1/No) = -4.95863
(N1/No) = e^(-4.95863)
(N1/No) = .0102548​

I then calculated for the % because the answer .012548 is a fraction.
.0102548/100 %
=1.025%​

However that answer is incorrect and I'm not exactly sure why. I made sure that I was using the (ln)-function instead of the (log)-function. I don't know if it is my math or if I'm putting it into the website incorrectly.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
blue_lilly said:

Homework Statement


The practical limit to ages that can be determined by radiocarbon dating is about 41000-yr-old sample, what percentage of the original 6 12 C atoms remains?

Homework Equations


(N1/No)=e^-λt

The Attempt at a Solution


Variables:
t = 41,000 yrs
T1/2 of Carbon = 5730 yrs
ln2 = .693

I basically plugged in the numbers and solved because you are given all the variables.
(N1/No)=e^-λt
(N1/No) = e^-(ln2/T1/2)t
(N1/No) = e^-(.693/5730 yrs)(41,000 yrs)
ln(N1/No) = -(.693/5730 yrs)(41,000 yrs)
ln(N1/No) = -(1.2094E-4)(41,000 yrs)
ln(N1/No) = -4.95863
(N1/No) = e^(-4.95863)
(N1/No) = .0102548​

I then calculated for the % because the answer .012548 is a fraction.
.0102548/100 %
=1.025%​

However that answer is incorrect and I'm not exactly sure why. I made sure that I was using the (ln)-function instead of the (log)-function. I don't know if it is my math or if I'm putting it into the website incorrectly.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
I get that e(-4.95863) ≈ 0.00702 .
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
SammyS said:
I get that e(-4.95863) ≈ 0.00702 .

You are correct, I must have copied it down wrong.

So then, I would take .00702 and divide by 100 to get the Percentage.

.00702/100 = 7.0225E-5%

This is correct, right?
 
blue_lilly said:
You are correct, I must have copied it down wrong.

So then, I would take .00702 and divide by 100 to get the Percentage.

.00702/100 = 7.0225E-5%

This is correct, right?

Isn't 1/10 equal to 10 % ?

You don't get that by dividing by 100 .
 
SammyS said:
Isn't 1/10 equal to 10 % ?

You don't get that by dividing by 100 .

Where are you getting the 10% from?

I was dividing by 100 because initially you start out with 100% of the material. Or am I incorrect with that idea?
 
blue_lilly said:
Where are you getting the 10% from?

I was dividing by 100 because initially you start out with 100% of the material. Or am I incorrect with that idea?
SammyS was illustrating that diving by 100 does not give the percentage.
What is 0.1 as a percentage? How is it calculated?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top