Radiotracer Decay - What's Left?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chyral
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay
Chyral
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Greetings all. I'm a just a chemist banging my head about some what seems to me as fundamentally a nuclear physics question, so please bear with me.

If you have a molecule bearing a radioactive atom, a PET radiotracer, say F-18 FDG or some such beast, and it decays (to O-18 correct?) what exactly happens to the entire molecule? Another way of putting it is: As the positron-neutrino pair is released, is the rest of the tracer molecule blown apart by kinetic energy from the decay event?
Or am I thinking too much in a classical sense and you are left with a molecule happily bearing O-18 rather than F-18?
And lastly, does the answer depend on what type of decay is occurring?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on the electron configuration of the radioactive elements daugher.

You can look on wikipedia for example, on all decay modes. Then there are things like "Internal conversion", "electron capture"; which changes the electron configuration of the daugher atom.
 
Thanks for the reply! So it looks like this was the wrong place to post (sorry about that). I have asked people here in radiochemistry and medical physics and I still am left without an answer, though. Oh well.
 
I'm not a radiochemist, but I believe that most of the time the daughter product dissociates from the tagged molecule/pharmaceutical (which remains intact)
 
Chyral said:
If you have a molecule bearing a radioactive atom, a PET radiotracer, say F-18 FDG or some such beast, and it decays (to O-18 correct?) what exactly happens to the entire molecule? Another way of putting it is: As the positron-neutrino pair is released, is the rest of the tracer molecule blown apart by kinetic energy from the decay event?
Or am I thinking too much in a classical sense and you are left with a molecule happily bearing O-18 rather than F-18?
And lastly, does the answer depend on what type of decay is occurring?

Hello Chyral,

I would say that the recoiling of the nucleus is negligible (specially for F) wrt the energy of positron-neutrino pair. In some way, that's why you can do imaging.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top