Zubair Ahmad
- 34
- 0
For radius of gyration we say distance from axis to a point where would mass is concentrated. isn't that center of mass?
The discussion revolves around the concepts of radius of gyration and center of mass, exploring their definitions, differences, and implications in physics. It includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications regarding mass concentration and moment of inertia.
Participants express differing views on the relationship between radius of gyration and center of mass, with no consensus reached on whether they can be considered equivalent or if they represent distinct concepts.
The discussion highlights the complexity of definitions and the mathematical relationships involved, with participants pointing out the need for careful consideration of the terms used and their implications in physical contexts.
No, that is not the correct definition of radius of gyration. The radius of gyration, r, is the perpendicular distance to the axis of rotation of a point mass whose moment of inertia (I=mr^2) is the same moment of inertia of the actual object having that same mass. So say an object having 10 kg of mass with an I of 1000 kg-m^2 is equivalent to a point mass of 10 Kg located10 meters away from the axis, so r = 10 m. In other words, r = sq rt (I/m).Zubair Ahmad said:For radius of gyration we say distance from axis to a point where would mass is concentrated. isn't that center of mass?
No, we have a single point where IF the whole mass was concentrated there, the moment of inertia would be equivalent to the moment of inertia of the object. A symmetrical object for example has its actual center of mass at the center of it at the rotation axis, but its radius of gyration is not 0, it is sq rt (I/m)Zubair Ahmad said:But physically we have a single point where we say whole mass is concentrated.
No, sir. The center of mass is real; the radius of gyration is imaginaryZubair Ahmad said:So can we say physically there are two such points