Radon 222 What is really going on?

  • Thread starter Thread starter radonbc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radon
radonbc
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Are the Alpha particles in the Rn 222 decay process actually new particles or something like Helium atoms with the electrons knocked off.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
radonbc said:
Are the Alpha particles in the Rn 222 decay process actually new particles or something like Helium atoms with the electrons knocked off.

It's not just 222Rn that decays via alpha emission! Every isotope marked in yellow in this nuclear chart (which is like an expanded periodic table, number of protons on the y axis, neutrons on the x) http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reColor.jsp?newColor=dm decays via alpha emission.

Now, we call the particles emitted by a nucleus (222Rn-> 218Po + ##\alpha##) alpha particles, but you are correct, they have the same thing as a helium nucleus. It's the same thing with "beta" decay - beta particles are electrons. Similarly "Beta plus" decay is positron emission. It's just a historical thing.
 
Great thanks, I get that other elements emit Alpha decay but are they creating new particles or changing existing particles. Where does the Alpha particle come from.
 
radonbc said:
Great thanks, I get that other elements emit Alpha decay but are they creating new particles or changing existing particles. Where does the Alpha particle come from.

The decay of the 222Rn nucleus. The decay goes like: 22286Rn-> 21884Po + α . The radon will turn into 218Po, which is two neutrons + two protons less than 222Rn
 
The protons and neutrons of the alpha particle come from the radon nucleus. No new particles, just the same in a different arrangement.

Beta decay is different, there new particles are created.
 
  • Like
Likes e.bar.goum
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top