Rain Collection: Does Wind Affect Filling Speed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Himal kharel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rain Water
AI Thread Summary
Wind affects the angle at which raindrops fall, but it does not significantly change the rate at which a bucket fills with rainwater. The separation of raindrops and the cross-sectional area of the bucket decrease at the same rate due to the cosine effect of the angle, meaning wind can be ignored in this context. However, if wind is strong enough to alter the trajectory of raindrops to a horizontal or upward direction, it could prevent the bucket from filling. On windy days, individuals do get wetter because the wind increases the effective surface area exposed to the rain. Overall, while wind influences the angle of rainfall, it does not impact the collection rate in a bucket under normal conditions.
Himal kharel
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
suppose rain water is being collected in bucket. does the rate at which it fill depend on wind?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you get wet faster on a very windy day??

Freefalling rain has some modest terminal velocity...that can easily be exceeded on a windy day delivering more rain per unit area.
 
No.

Say your raindrops were separated by 1 cm as they fell vertically. Then say the wind speed matched the vertical velocity of the raindrops. The raindrops would fall at a 45 degree angle.

If you're measuring the separation between raindrops perpendicular to their path, the path of the raindrops is now 1cm * cos(45). In other words, their paths are closer together.

Because the raindrops are falling at an angle, the cross-sectional diameter of the bucket decreases. Since the raindrops are falling at a 45 degree angle, the cross sectional diameter would be the diameter * cos(45).

The actual angle used (i.e. wind speed) won't matter, because you'll be multiplying by the cosine of the angle for both the separation between raindrops and the cross sectional diameter of the bucket.

In other words, both the separation and the cross sectional diameter are decreasing at exactly the same rate. As a result, you can completely ignore the effect of the wind and just look at the separation that would exist if they were falling vertically.

Now if the raindrops were falling straight down and you instead just tilted the bucket, then the bucket would fill at a slower rate because only the angle of the bucket relative to the raindrops was being changed - the raindrops would still be separated by a constant amount.

There is a limit to that, however. Conceivably, the wind could be blowing so hard the raindrops are moving horizontally or even rising (which is how hail forms, except at high altitudes where the temperature is colder). In that case, the bucket wouldn't fill at all.

And, to answer Naty's question - yes, you do get wetter on a windy day, since the surface area of the front of you is much larger than the surface area of the top of you. Well, at least unless you have some severe glandular problems and assume the shape of a sphere (see the "transversing in rain" thread).
 
Hold on,
Suppose the wind was blowing horizontally, but the rain continued to come into the airstream. Doesn't this imply that the airstream could support an infinite quantity of water?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top