Raising Complex Numbers to Powers of Angles - What Happens?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrea2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles
AI Thread Summary
Raising a complex number to the power of an angle in radians involves using the exponential function and logarithms. Specifically, for the complex number i raised to an angle a, the formula is (i)^a = e^(a x log(i)). The logarithm of i is calculated as log(i) = i x π/2, leading to the expression (i)^a = e^(i x aπ). This indicates that the result is another complex number, demonstrating that the behavior of complex numbers in this context is more straightforward than that of real numbers raised to an angle. Understanding these principles can clarify the relationship between complex exponentiation and angles.
Andrea2
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
is there anyone who can tell me what happen when i raise a complex number to the power of an angle in rad? for example, what is the result of (i)^1rad?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
is there anyone who can tell me what happen when i raise a complex number to the power of an angle in rad? for example, what is the result of (i)^1rad?
Since you ask about the power of a COMPLEX number, so I suppose that you already know what happen when you raise a REAL number to the power of an angle in rad. For example, what is the result of 2^1rad ?
 
i don't know exactly what happen if i raise a real number to the power of an angle, i tried to answer also to this question, but five minutes ago i think I've found the answer to my first question, and i think that this problem is more difficult with real numbers than with complex! My solution is that (i)^a = e^(a x log(i)) with a=angle in rad. log(i) = i x p/2 (p=3.1416...), so (i)^a = e^(i x ap), that is a complex number...
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
924
3
Replies
108
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Back
Top