Raman spectroscopy: data analysis: convolution

liss
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hey guys,
i hope you can help.

my task is to analyse data of raman spectroscopy. therefor i have to deconvolute it. that means the data must have been convoluted somewhere.

is it true that the raw data which i receive is convoluted already? or is it common to convolute the data "active"?
i guess its a stupid question but i am not quite sure.

thanks in regard
 
Physics news on Phys.org
its a very good question if you haven't come across convolution method before. i had the same question a few months ago on my medical imaging course. the idea is that the data you take from any detector, is imperfect and as a result, the raw data you get is a convolution of the Fourier transform of your detector and the data. so information about the Fourier transform of your detector will allow you to do the inverse transformation, and then the raw data is just multiplied by the inverse Fourier transform to give your final data. i am unforunately not very familiar with the raman spectrometer detectors, but I am sure they have basic experiments run on them to determine the information about their detectors
 
thank you so much for your detailed answer, i got it now.

as far as i can remember we used the gaussian curve to deconvolute the data based on a hint of my prof. and it worked out.
only when i prepared my talk i have wondered where the convolution takes place.
so your answer suffices absolutly :)
 
woopy :P
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top