Random Photos

  • Thread starter Thread starter morrobay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photos Random
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a variety of photography topics, showcasing personal photos and experiences from different locations, including Ko-Larn Island, Central Park, and various natural landscapes. Participants share insights about the techniques used in their photography, such as drone shots and long exposure panoramas, and discuss the beauty of nature, including autumn scenes and night skies. There are mentions of personal stories, including a trip to Sweden and memories of family history, particularly relating to military service during WWII. The conversation also touches on the impact of the pandemic on tourism and local businesses, as well as the enjoyment of photography as a creative outlet. Additionally, there are discussions about photography gear, including vintage lenses and new cameras, and the excitement of capturing unique moments like rainbows and wildlife. Overall, the thread highlights the joy of photography and the shared experiences of capturing the world around them.
  • #801
BadgerBadger92 said:
I’m sorry if I posted these before, I don’t remember if I did. What do you think of these shots? Click on the photos to see them better.
Very nice shots with loads of character and atmosphere, I like them a lot!

They feel "old school" I think, and I mean it in a good way.
Which gear did/do you use? (i.e. camera and lens/lenses?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #802
DennisN said:
Very nice shots with loads of character and atmosphere, I like them a lot!

They feel "old school" I think, and I mean it in a good way.
Which gear did/do you use? (i.e. camera and lens/lenses?)
Thank you! I hope some other members can tell me what they think too

I used a Nikon D750 with a 24-120mm F2 lens, and a tripod of course lol
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #803
Ok, here's something for lovers of vintage gear and "lensoholics" like me... :smile:

A couple of months ago I acquired another optic toy, a so-called "bokeh monster", which is a nickname for lenses that can deliver (1) a small depth of field and (2) a very smooth bokeh (i.e. background blur).
I got it for ca $30 on an online auction, which I consider a bargain.

Here is the Pentacon 135mm f/2.8 (zebra style version)...

1 - Pentacon 135mm.jpg


...which was made in G.D.R. (East Germany):

3 - Pentacon 135mm, Made in GDR.jpg


One small thing that caught me by surprise was that the lens has a detachable metal hood
which I haven't seen on any of my other lenses:

4 - Pentacon 135mm, Lens Hood.jpg


But here's what makes the lens extra cool and a so-called "bokeh monster"; it's got 15 aperture blades (!):

5 - Pentacon 135mm, 15 blades.jpg


I really admire the workmanship.
The lens is very, very finely made with smooth but robust controls, and it is a pleasure to use.
Well, partially :smile:. There is one downside in my opinion: it's heavy (ca 500 g):

6 - Pentacon 135mm, 500g.jpg


The weight makes it a bit tricky to use handheld. Together with camera and M42 adapter the total weight of the gear approaches 1 kg. So, handheld, you don't do exactly casual point-and-shoot stuff with this setup, but rather a bit of physical workout :biggrin:. And this little beast truly deserves to be called "built like a tank". I don't know if it would withstand a nuclear explosion, a major asteroid hit or hitting the singularity of a black hole, but when I hold it, it feels like there is a chance of survival :biggrin:.

But boy... it can really blur out backgrounds in photos:
(note how the backgrounds have been "disintegrated" in the photos, which I took earlier in July)

DSC09005m2.jpg


DSC08965m2.jpg


More info for anyone who may be interested:
(by the way, I notify @Andy Resnick who I think also likes vintage optics :smile:)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Andy Resnick, collinsmark, BillTre and 2 others
  • #804
DennisN said:
Ok, here's something for lovers of vintage gear and "lensoholics" like me... :smile:

A couple of months ago I acquired another optic toy, a so-called "bokeh monster", which is a nickname for lenses that can deliver (1) a small depth of field and (2) a very smooth bokeh (i.e. background blur).
I got it for ca $30 on an online auction, which I consider a bargain.

Here is the Pentacon 135mm f/2.8 (zebra style version)...

View attachment 315871

...which was made in G.D.R. (East Germany):

View attachment 315872

One small thing that caught me by surprise was that the lens has a detachable metal hood
which I haven't seen on any of my other lenses:

View attachment 315873

But here's what makes the lens extra cool and a so-called "bokeh monster"; it's got 15 aperture blades (!):

View attachment 315874

I really admire the workmanship.
The lens is very, very finely made with smooth but robust controls, and it is a pleasure to use.
Well, partially :smile:. There is one downside in my opinion: it's heavy (ca 500 g):

View attachment 315875

The weight makes it a bit tricky to use handheld. Together with camera and M42 adapter the total weight of the gear approaches 1 kg. So, handheld, you don't do exactly casual point-and-shoot stuff with this setup, but rather a bit of physical workout :biggrin:. And this little beast truly deserves to be called "built like a tank". I don't know if it would withstand a nuclear explosion, a major asteroid hit or hitting the singularity of a black hole, but when I hold it, it feels like there is a chance of survival :biggrin:.

But boy... it can really blur out backgrounds in photos:
(note how the backgrounds have been "disintegrated" in the photos, which I took earlier in July)

View attachment 315876

View attachment 315877

More info for anyone who may be interested:
(by the way, I notify @Andy Resnick who I think also likes vintage optics :smile:)
The GDR is a nice touch. Not seen that in a while.
 
  • #805
pinball1970 said:
The GDR is a nice touch.
Some East German vintage lenses are highly appreciated by some vintage camera gear users.

Two years ago I would never have guessed it.

Likewise, there are quite a few highly appreciated lenses from the Soviet Union/Russia, which also was a surprise to me.

Since I started looking for vintage gear on online auction sites I've come across some really weird gear.

For instance, right now there is a Soviet KGB counterespionage camera kit available at the moment on a popular Swedish online site (here). Current price is $90 (80 British pound). No bids yet. A cool kit, but I'm not going to bid on it.

A quote in the ad translated to English:

"USSR-era camera prototype designed by Khrushchev, manufactured by Zenith on behalf of the KGB, intended for counter-espionage above all in the GDR."
 
  • #806
DennisN said:
Ok, here's something for lovers of vintage gear and "lensoholics" like me... :smile:

A couple of months ago I acquired another optic toy, a so-called "bokeh monster", which is a nickname for lenses that can deliver (1) a small depth of field and (2) a very smooth bokeh (i.e. background blur).
I got it for ca $30 on an online auction, which I consider a bargain.

Here is the Pentacon 135mm f/2.8 (zebra style version)...

View attachment 315871

...which was made in G.D.R. (East Germany):

View attachment 315872

One small thing that caught me by surprise was that the lens has a detachable metal hood
which I haven't seen on any of my other lenses:

View attachment 315873

But here's what makes the lens extra cool and a so-called "bokeh monster"; it's got 15 aperture blades (!):

View attachment 315874

I really admire the workmanship.
The lens is very, very finely made with smooth but robust controls, and it is a pleasure to use.
Well, partially :smile:. There is one downside in my opinion: it's heavy (ca 500 g):

View attachment 315875

The weight makes it a bit tricky to use handheld. Together with camera and M42 adapter the total weight of the gear approaches 1 kg. So, handheld, you don't do exactly casual point-and-shoot stuff with this setup, but rather a bit of physical workout :biggrin:. And this little beast truly deserves to be called "built like a tank". I don't know if it would withstand a nuclear explosion, a major asteroid hit or hitting the singularity of a black hole, but when I hold it, it feels like there is a chance of survival :biggrin:.

But boy... it can really blur out backgrounds in photos:
(note how the backgrounds have been "disintegrated" in the photos, which I took earlier in July)

View attachment 315876

View attachment 315877

More info for anyone who may be interested:
(by the way, I notify @Andy Resnick who I think also likes vintage optics :smile:)
I’m thinking about buying a Sigma 85mm F1.2 ART lens. It’s perfect for portraits and getting good lens compression and is very sharp with excellent bokeh. Too bad it’s nearly a thousand dollars, so I’m saving up
 
  • #807
BadgerBadger92 said:
Sigma 85mm F1.2 ART lens
I think I've read about it somewhere.
BadgerBadger92 said:
Too bad it’s nearly a thousand dollars
Gosh, that's a lot for one lens, but I know very well that some lenses can be really expensive.

I've mostly got vintage lenses, and I've spent around 2000 dollars on all my photography gear (incl. camera, filters, tripods and various accessories).

I hadn't really planned to spend that much, but photography is a hobby I realized I really enjoy. And life is short so one may enjoy life as much as possible. :)

I consider my money well spent. For that amount I have acquired ca 30 various lenses, of which I consider ca 22 of them to be keepers. I'll likely sell the other 8.

It is a bit ridiculous to have so many lenses, but one benefit is that I have gotten the opportunity to try out the stuff thoroughly, so now I know which my favorites are ( the different lenses have different strengths and different rendering characteristics).

With my range of lenses I also have the opportunity to do practically everything between superwide focal lengths up to supertele (and also macro photography). I've got 12, 28, 35, 40, 50, 55, 58, 135, 200, 300 and 400 mm prime lenses. It's a bit crazy, I know :).

It fits my character, I have to admit. I love to experiment. :)
And it's been very fun to look for and try all the vintage gear.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes Andy Resnick, Bystander and BillTre
  • #808
Oh well, this time of year we always used to have the theme of autumn in a competition. I'm not getting around so much so dug this up from 2007. No spectacular colours, no special lens or technique, and I wonder if it hasn't even faded sitting in a disk, but I still like it. Our hemisphere going towards its winter repose as it does every year... well used to.

Immagine 804.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Rive, DennisN, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #809
epenguin said:
No spectacular colours, no special lens or technique, and I wonder if it hasn't even faded sitting in a disk, but I still like it.
I like it too! To me it looks a bit like a landscape painting of a nice scenery (and if the colors were boosted I think it might lose the feeling of "painting").
 
  • #810
DennisN said:
I think I've read about it somewhere.

Gosh, that's a lot for one lens, but I know very well that some lenses can be really expensive.

I've mostly got vintage lenses, and I've spent around 2000 dollars on all my photography gear (incl. camera, filters, tripods and various accessories).

I hadn't really planned to spend that much, but photography is a hobby I realized I really enjoy. And life is short so one may enjoy life as much as possible. :)

I consider my money well spent. For that amount I have acquired ca 30 various lenses, of which I consider ca 22 of them to be keepers. I'll likely sell the other 8.

It is a bit ridiculous to have so many lenses, but one benefit is that I have gotten the opportunity to try out the stuff thoroughly, so now I know which my favorites are ( the different lenses have different strengths and different rendering characteristics).

With my range of lenses I also have the opportunity to do practically everything between superwide focal lengths up to supertele (and also macro photography). I've got 12, 28, 35, 40, 50, 55, 58, 135, 200, 300 and 400 mm prime lenses. It's a bit crazy, I know :).

It fits my character, I have to admit. I love to experiment. :)
And it's been very fun to look for and try all the vintage gear.
I also forgot to tell you I love your floral photography work! Nice colors!
 
  • #811
BadgerBadger92 said:
I also forgot to tell you I love your floral photography work! Nice colors!
Thanks! :smile:
 
  • #812
Three more autumn photos...

Fallen leaf:
Yellow Autumn Leaf.jpg


Autumn vines at the corner:
Red Autumn Corner.jpg


Colorful autumn vines:
Autumn Vine.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes pinball1970, collinsmark, Rive and 5 others
  • #813
Gorgeous Autumn vines @DennisN Is that all in natural sunlight? Octoberfest with Neng, 39
IMG20221026154420.jpg
 
  • #814
morrobay said:
Gorgeous Autumn vines @DennisN Is that all in natural sunlight?
Thanks! Yes.
(though I edited the so-called "gamma correction" which can give more vibrant colors.
Edit: I also shot in the so-called "vivid" scene mode in the camera & I used a lens which gives warm colors.
Edit 2: And I used a CPL filter too)

The third photo is actually not taken in direct sunlight. And it's only a small part (maybe 5%) of a long wall full of vines in similar colors. It's nearby, and I'm thinking of going back and shoot sometime when the wall is hit by direct sunlight.
 
Last edited:
  • #815
DennisN said:
(though I edited the so-called "gamma correction" which can give more vibrant colors.
Is this an in-camera setting? My Canon G-15 produces pretty dull colours that I have to boost in PhotoShop.
 
  • #816
DaveC426913 said:
Is this an in-camera setting?
No. It's in Photoshop:

Choose Menu->Image->Adjustments->Exposure.
Then in the opened dialog there is a "Gamma Correction" slider.
When I use it (which is quite often*) I almost always lower the value (dragging the slider to the right).

* I've found myself to like the effect. I often do:

Menu->Image->Adjustments->Levels->[Auto] (auto levels button) and afterwards I lower the gamma correction.

Edit:

I've also found that Menu->Image-Adjustments->Vibrance->[Vibrance slider] dragged right can give a more natural boost to colors than "saturation".
 
  • #817
A simple little bench that I built in my garage for Raspberry Pi experiments.

GarageBench.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes collinsmark, morrobay, BillTre and 2 others
  • #818
BadgerBadger92 said:
I’m thinking about buying a Sigma 85mm F1.2 ART lens. It’s perfect for portraits and getting good lens compression and is very sharp with excellent bokeh. Too bad it’s nearly a thousand dollars, so I’m saving up
I read about that lens (minor correction: it's 85/1.4, not 85/1.2), it seems to be a great deal- alternatives cost several times as much.

When I was shooting with a Sony Alpha, I used the 85/1.4 lens (Sony FE 85mm f/1.4 GM) and it was a joy to work with.

Good lenses cost money, but the benefit is that you won't ever need to upgrade.
 
  • #819
kyphysics said:
She-Hulk is light and fun, but needs more plot tension.

There needs to be either a real physical danger (she totally thrashed her first opponent without even a fight. . .can we at least see her capable of getting hurt?) and/or a real value/ethical one. . .something to up the stakes/tension and balance out the camp/fun.

Just my humble opinion.

DennisN said:
Choose Menu->Image->Adjustments->Exposure.
Then in the opened dialog there is a "Gamma Correction" slider.
When I use it (which is quite often*) I almost always lower the value (dragging the slider to the right).

* I've found myself to like the effect. I often do:

Menu->Image->Adjustments->Levels->[Auto] (auto levels button) and afterwards I lower the gamma correction.

Edit:

I've also found that Menu->Image-Adjustments->Vibrance->[Vibrance slider] dragged right can give a more natural boost to colors than "saturation".
I've experimented with Gamma Correction and Vibrance but couldn't figure out what they were doing that wasn't covered by Levels and Saturation, which is where I spend most of my time.

I will read up on them and play some more.
 
  • #820
A spur of the moment shot some minutes ago...
...the logo of Physics Forums shown on my tablet screen, shot with my Canon macro lens (the logo has a dark background, since I run my browser in "dark mode"):

DSC08472m1.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, Rive, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #821
Today I came across this tree which is apparently caught in a time warp. At the bottom it's still summer, but at the top it's autumn!

25A09EFB-EC0F-471D-8842-B2D82E0E19D8.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DennisN, Rive, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #822
jtbell said:
Today I came across this tree which is apparently caught in a time warp. At the bottom it's still summer, but at the top it's autumn!

View attachment 316145
We have some beautiful effects here I've tried to capture where only the outer tufts of leaves are gold or orange while the rest of the tree is still green.
 
  • #823
There is probably a gradation in temperatures the leaves experience (from top to bottom or inside to more exposed areas) during mild cold periods.
I am guessing the leaves respond to their local temperatures independently.
 
  • #824
BillTre said:
There is probably a gradation in temperatures the leaves experience (from top to bottom or inside to more exposed areas) during mild cold periods.
I am guessing the leaves respond to their local temperatures independently.
And that gradient affects the resorption/conservation of chlorophyll that is seen.
 
  • #825
I took out my East German "bokeh monster" (Pentacon 135mm) for a short session in the courtyard today...

October afternoon:
(I quite liked this because of the somewhat "metallic" colors of the leaves.
It really surprised me, I haven't seen this effect before in any of my photos)

October afternoon.png


Colorful leaves in afternoon sunlight:
Colorful leaves in afternoon sunlight.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Andy Resnick, pinball1970, berkeman and 5 others
  • #826
If anyone thinks macro lenses are too puny, here's an alternative vintage device for sale :biggrin:: Jeol Microprobe (an electron microscope).

Start saving, it can be yours for merely 9 999 EUR... :smile:

148613203_b_6.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes collinsmark, morrobay and BillTre
  • #827
DennisN said:
I took out my East German "bokeh monster" (Pentacon 135mm) for a short session
For most people it's the dog which they takes out for a walk :wink:
 
  • #828
DennisN said:
I took out my East German "bokeh monster" (Pentacon 135mm) for a short session in the courtyard today...

October afternoon:
(I quite liked this because of the somewhat "metallic" colors of the leaves.
It really surprised me, I haven't seen this effect before in any of my photos)

View attachment 316269

Colorful leaves in afternoon sunlight:
View attachment 316270
Stunning yet again. The first red leaf looks like woven fabric. Beautiful.
 
  • #829
pinball1970 said:
Stunning yet again. The first red leaf looks like woven fabric. Beautiful.
Thanks! 🙂

I got pretty excited by the look too, as I hadn't seen it before.
I will try to recreate it elsewhere, though I'm not quite sure what made it look like that.

It could be the lens, the reflective characteristics of the leaf, the afternoon sunlight, an odd white balance (?) or some combination of those perhaps. 🙂
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, morrobay and berkeman
  • #830
Some various from the back area around here.
IMG_20221030_113510.jpg
IMG_20221030_113712_1.jpg
IMG_20221030_113727.jpg
IMG_20221030_113800_1.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes berkeman, DennisN, BillTre and 2 others
  • #831
Same area taken from back window. 10x @ 75m.
IMG_20221031_083338.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and Rive
  • #832
It was foggy yesterday, and whenever it is I get an automatic urge to go out and take some photos.

1.jpg


6.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes epenguin, morrobay, Rive and 2 others
  • #833
DennisN said:
It was foggy yesterday, and whenever it is I get an automatic urge to go out and take some photos.
I too like foggy weather, but somehow I just can't get it right on photos. Something somehow always different.
We had a hike today and it was foggy/cloudy and we made some photos, but... Well...
DSC_0050_b.jpg

...this time it was the road: it wanted to tell a different story :doh:

This one was caught well, I think - but it's not about fog:
DSC_0150_b.jpg

That stream has something against roads o0)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes epenguin, collinsmark, morrobay and 2 others
  • #834
After a cappuccino at Jomtien beach cafe alot to photograph:
IMG_20221104_121023_1.jpg
IMG_20221104_122210.jpg
IMG_20221104_120046_1.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and Rive
  • #835
The Thai ministry of health legalized cannibus last June. Now everywhere you look:
IMG_20221104_112243.jpg
IMG_20221104_113220.jpg
IMG_20221104_123752_1.jpg
IMG_20221104_121607.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and DennisN
  • #836
morrobay said:
The Thai ministry of health legalized cannibus last June. Now everywhere you look:
Happens. It'll pass. Once upon a time we got hit by a cocktail wave: cocktail bars on every street corner and in every 100m inbetween.
Most of them gone in two years without any fuss.
 
  • #837
A red leaf:

DSC00058m2 (p800).jpg

(Lens: Helios 44M7, this time on a full frame camera (Sony A7R))
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, morrobay, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #838
Air 32C, water 30C . You can get condos here for about $30,000. Photos Jomtien Beach.
IMG_20221107_114109.jpg
IMG_20221107_114049_1.jpg
IMG_20221107_105843.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #839
And looking South
IMG_20221107_113952.jpg
 
  • #840
And looking West - Sorry - But it's
IMG20221107161316.jpg
world I live in...
 
  • #841
I've just finished servicing one of my lenses, and I'm glad I have a gorgeous subject nearby to test it on:

DSC00143m1.jpg


"Beware of what you write on internet.
She sees you. She monitors you.
She can come and "kill you with kindness."" :)
 
  • Like
Likes Astranut, morrobay, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #842
Lighthouse time...

Lighthouse no 1:
10 - Lighthouse 1a - m2.jpg


The same lighthouse from another angle, with surroundings:
19 - Lighthouse 1b - m1.jpg


Lighthouse no 2 (taken from quite a distance, ca 500m):
19 - Lighthouse 2 - m2.jpg

Lenses used: Canon nFD 50mm f/1.4 (photos 1 & 2) and Sony 55-210mm (photo 3).
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, morrobay and BillTre
  • #843
Beautiful clear lighthouse photos @DennisN I take it that first two photo are a lighthouse that is for looks ? Because it does not look like an area , like a point, where a lighthouse would be required.
IMG_20221110_093721.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #844
On the lighthouse theme, here's the oldest one still in existence:
IMG_20210815_160905.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DennisN, BillTre and morrobay
  • #845
Lighthouse, South end/point Pattaya bay. Looking North and South West
IMG_20221111_111728.jpg
IMG_20221111_112036.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes collinsmark and DennisN
  • #846
morrobay said:
I take it that first two photo are a lighthouse that is for looks ?
It's an old lighthouse built in 1822 (a historical landmark here). The second one is too, it was built in 1878. The city has expanded quite a bit to the north, so back then I think they were both located at the northernmost part of the harbor.
 
Last edited:
  • #847
DennisN said:
A red leaf:

View attachment 316775
(Lens: Helios 44M7, this time on a full frame camera (Sony A7R))
You captured that velvet effect again. Very nice.
 
  • #848
Ibix said:
On the lighthouse theme, here's the oldest one still in existence:

morrobay said:
Lighthouse, South end/point Pattaya bay.

There is something particularly compelling about lighthouses, I think. They're cool, very useful, often beautiful, and there's also something quite poetic about them as they are guides to distant travellers.

pinball1970 said:
You captured that velvet effect again. Very nice.
Thanks! I have to give some credit to Mother Nature. When I was shooting I took a closer look on these leaves, and they were visibly darker along the veins, which I suppose adds to the "3D effect".
 
  • #849
I played poker with my dad yesterday. The poor guy lost a lot in this round. :smile:
A nice straight:

Poker2(640).jpg
 
  • #850
Spider web no 1:
Spider web 1.jpg


Spider web no 2 & 3:
(Two competing spiders I wonder? Or maybe one overachieving spider? :) )
Spider web 2.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes morrobay, collinsmark and Rive

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Back
Top