What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Thoughts
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
11,071 replies · 633K views
fresh_42 said:
I just found this - looks a bit like the Scottish west coast:

View attachment 263255
You know how maps like that in fantasy novels never look quite plausible? I strongly suspected I'd enjoy Juliet E McKenna's books the instant I picked one up, because the maps of her continents had long narrow triangular cutouts, so you could have cut them out and constructed a partial sphere (or polyhedral approximation to one, anyway).

This version seems to have the maps crossing the cutouts, but the version in the books doesn't.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WWGD said:
Seems kind of strange these people who describe themselves as _passionate_ something: Chess players, Mathematicians, etc. Is this a separate sexual thing or do they have " feelings" towards these activities, etc?

I'm passionate about partial fraction decompositions
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, WWGD and BillTre
WWGD said:
No details, please, unless [...].
Reminds me of this

20130402.gif

(Source: https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2013-04-02)

[Edit: click the source link for a more readable version of the comic that avoids PF's auto-resizing.]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
The sentences that finally put a nail in the coffin on doubts about the usefulness of commas. " How do you know Einstein* ? "Me: I never said I knew Einstein .

*Instead of " How do you know, Einstein?"
 
WWGD said:
Aftermath=? After Math=...? Good luck!
Just hopeing I'll still have some math skills in the after math. Thanks for the "good luck"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, ProfuselyQuarky, fresh_42 and 1 other person
Ibix said:
You, I take it? I hope you're on the mend. Those staple things are amazing - they come out and barely leave a mark.
They're coming out this coming Monday
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD, ProfuselyQuarky and Ibix
Undergrad logic: non-constructive proof, instructor (I) can't give counter-examples to false claims in proof, therefore proof is correct. :oldgrumpy:
 
I had BBQ ribs, fries and sweet pickled tomatoes for lunch.

I think I'll order Chinese for dinner. I'll get the House Special chow mein, the spicy king prawns and a pancake roll.
 
I was told that my neighbor killed a big black-snake trying to get his baby chicks. I cried since I've caught a large one every summer for years; thinking it was my pet he killed. But I heard this sound in my chicken coop and low and behold MY Snake!
IMG_3248.JPG

This big boy is 2 meters+ in length.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: atyy, nuuskur and BillTre
I thought this was mildly interesting to look at :wink:

1591486472312.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD, nuuskur and Ibix
mfb said:
"bi" means "two/twice"
"semi" means "half"
Why are biannual and semiannual synonyms in English?
Because we have "biennial" to mean "once every two years", and we wouldn't want to confuse anything.
 
mfb said:
Why are biannual and semiannual synonyms in English?
Why does "flammable" mean the same thing as "inflammable"?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
DrGreg said:
Why does "flammable" mean the same thing as "inflammable"?
Aren't there serious efforts to deprecate "inflammable" and just use "flammable" and "non-flammable", because this is a genuine safety issue?
 
Ibix said:
Aren't there serious efforts to deprecate "inflammable" and just use "flammable" and "non-flammable", because this is a genuine safety issue?
From TIL:
hmmm27 said:
army : "say again", because "repeat" is an artillery command.
Do they say "conflagration" in the army?
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
Keith_McClary said:
From TIL:
Do they say "conflagration" in the army?
I imagine they do. Probably not so much over the radio in combat, which was what I was referring to.
 
Last edited:
skyshrimp said:
I had BBQ ribs, fries and sweet pickled tomatoes for lunch.

I think I'll order Chinese for dinner. I'll get the House Special chow mein, the spicy king prawns and a pancake roll.
You mean you will order Chinese people to cook for you? ;)
 
WWGD said:
Wonder if you could lose weight by eating the same amount of calories ( holding all else constant) and thinking more.


In the experiment, subjects had to solve a puzzle or a tough maths question. Would Random Thoughts burn more?
Maybe you can work off a single piece of popcorn.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
WWGD said:
Supposedly, thinking is calorie-intensive.
Dunno 'bout anybody else, but when I'm trying to brainstorm something, I umm..pee more... which to me implies that I've been burning more hydrocarbons, thus producing more water.

It'd probably be easier to check on the other end, though : just hook somebody up to a fancy breathalyzer and check for O2 consumption andor CO2 emission levels.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
hmmm27 said:
just hook somebody up to a fancy breathalyzer and check for O2 consumption andor CO2 emission levels.
Girl-Runner-Tread-with-New-CC-1-1024x703.jpg


Like this, except replace treadmill with thinking chair.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hmmm27
hmmm27 said:
Dunno 'bout anybody else, but when I'm trying to brainstorm something, I umm..pee more... which to me implies that I've been burning more hydrocarbons, thus producing more water.

It'd probably be easier to check on the other end, though : just hook somebody up to a fancy breathalyzer and check for O2 consumption andor CO2 emission levels.
Sounds good in theory, but the breathalyzer is in the shop and my grant to hire people and pay them hasn't gone through yet :).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hmmm27