- #1
FZ+
- 1,604
- 3
Tick all the proposals you agree with.
Originally posted by FZ+
Well, I'm just looking through to see which ones haven't been touched for a long while.
The trouble with atoms etc is rather that it overlaps with two of them. People who want to talk about electrodynamics, energy levels and so on would more likely go to quantum where they get more attention, and people who want to talk about the rutheford experiment, chemical properties would go other places.
For example, someone who wants to talk about the design of bridges would end up torn between Engineering design, civil engineering, mechanical engineering, material engineering and just General Physics.
The point is that these categorisation are good for University courses where you want a good deal of core learning, but don't work so well for a forum.
Question : How Can I Object on that ?Make politics a forum in its own right
The purpose of randomised requests is to gather unbiased feedback and opinions from a diverse group of individuals. This helps to ensure that all perspectives and ideas are considered when making decisions or creating proposals.
The requests are randomised by using a computer-generated algorithm that selects a random sample of individuals from a larger population. This helps to eliminate any potential bias in the selection process.
Ticking all proposals we agree with helps to accurately gauge the level of consensus on a particular issue. It also allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the different opinions and perspectives within a group.
Yes, you are free to only tick proposals that you agree with. However, it is encouraged to also consider proposals that you may not initially agree with in order to get a more well-rounded understanding of the topic at hand.
The results of randomised requests are used to inform decision-making and shape proposals. They can also provide valuable insights and perspectives that may have not been considered previously.