Range of validity of Maxwell's equations with charges

AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's equations with charges are valid in regions where charges are present, but they also apply in vacuum by setting charge density to zero. The equations describe electric and magnetic fields that interact even in the absence of charges, emphasizing their generality. Charges create fields that extend throughout space, not just at their locations, leading to phenomena like field divergence near charges. When formulating problems, Maxwell's equations are applicable to the entire space defined by a charge distribution, rather than requiring separate equations for each infinitesimal volume. This comprehensive approach allows for a unified understanding of electromagnetic phenomena.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272
Maxwell's equations with charges can be written as the following (in the cgs system):

\frac{\partial \vec E}{\partial t} =c \vec \nabla \wedge \vec B-4\pi \vec J.
\frac{\partial \vec B}{\partial t} =-c \vec \nabla \wedge \vec E.
\vec \nabla \cdot \vec E =4 \pi \rho.
\vec \nabla \cdot \vec B =0.

If I'm right, these equations are valid only where charges are present. It means, almost nowhere! For instance consider a positively charged table. \rho(t,\vec x) is of course not continuous since we're dealing with charges. In other words it is zero everywhere when there's no charge. If we assume the electron has a volume, then the equations would be valid within the volume of the electron. So in an neutral atom, these equations are valid less than 0.001% of the space (only where the proton and the electron are).
I'm just curious if I'm right. In an affirmative case, why do we bother with them and why don't we only use Maxwell's equation in vacuum?
In the latter case, I could imagine having a lot of boundary equations (precisely the places enclosing the charges) and I could only use Maxwell's equation in vacuum, taking into account all the boundary equations not to lose any information about the charges.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maxwell's equations are valid even when no charges are present. In that case, you can set \rho=0 and you can see that the equations are still there, and the E and B fields also interact.

We use this formulation because it's more general than the formulation without charges.

Because the equations are differential equations, even if some terms equal zero, the E and B fields need not equal zero. Just like if dx/dt=0 it doesn't mean x=0 for all time.
 
Matterwave said:
Maxwell's equations are valid even when no charges are present. In that case, you can set \rho=0 and you can see that the equations are still there, and the E and B fields also interact.

We use this formulation because it's more general than the formulation without charges.

Because the equations are differential equations, even if some terms equal zero, the E and B fields need not equal zero. Just like if dx/dt=0 it doesn't mean x=0 for all time.

Ah ok, thanks.
I'm getting it. I feel I'm learning a lot, it's incredibly nice!
 
You need to consider that charges create fields throughout your space, not simply where the charges are. Infact, in classical EM, the fields diverge at the actual charges. For example your coulomb field blows up as your field point approaches your charges.

When you formulate a problem, you define a space you're working in. Maxwell's equations will be valid in the entire space. You don't have a new equation for every infinitesimal volume in the space, it's simply one set of equations for the whole space given some charge distribution inside.

Think of a gravitational potential. It's defined for your entire volume of space, not just where the mass is.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top