Rare mineral to power dark energizers in a sci-fi story

  • Thread starter Thread starter dbaezner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Sci-fi
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a real substance to draw dark energy from space for powering large spaceships, with a focus on avoiding fictional materials. While dark energy is largely theoretical and not practically usable, participants suggest various real materials. Metallic hydrogen is mentioned as a lab-created substance, while Erbium and Samarium are noted for their commonality despite being labeled "rare earth metals." Iridium is discussed for its interesting properties, although it is not as rare as its name suggests. Technetium is recommended for its unique characteristics, including being radioactive and found in space, making it suitable for science fiction narratives. Other suggestions include Promethium, which is rare and unstable, and a range of fictional materials like unobtainium and kryptonite, highlighting the storytelling flexibility of using made-up elements. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the creative freedom in choosing either real or fictional materials for narrative purposes.
dbaezner
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi. I'm looking for a substance that could be used to draw dark energy from space and power very large spaceships. Ideally, it would be something real but rare on Earth. I was using a made-up mineral called sparkle, but I found that using something made up didn't feel right, otherwise why hasn't it been found on Earth yet? I'm also considering tritium, but I read that its natural state is a gas with a very short half-life. Star Wars uses plasma, so I'm trying to avoid that. Star Trek uses anti-matter, so I'm also avoiding that. Should I use a rare gem to draw/focus dark energy?

Thanks
Dirk
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since this is very far outside the realm of possibility, you can use pretty much anything you want. Dark energy is so weak on anything approaching "local" distances that it might as well not exist so anything you use is going to be completely unrealistic in terms of actual physics.
 
Well: There is no such thing. You cannot use a material to "draw dark energy from space".

If you just look for some fancy and exotic material: What about metallic hydrogen? We can create it in the lab now.
 
  • Like
Likes Rubidium_71
They are common, and they sound boring to me because I know that they are used in industrial applications.
 
mfb said:
common
How can they be classified as "Rare Earth Metals" if they are common :oldconfused:

What about Iridium? Nice name I think.
 
The name is misleading, they are not that rare. They are just harder to separate from each other because their chemical properties are quite similar.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
mfb said:
The name is misleading, they are not that rare. They are just harder to separate from each other because their chemical properties are quite similar.
Yeah, @Greg Bernhardt, I was confused by the name too, before reading about them and discovering what mfb posted here. It DOES seem odd that they are called "rare" Earth's but aren't rare. :smile:
 
mfb said:
The name is misleading, they are not that rare. They are just harder to separate from each other because their chemical properties are quite similar.
phinds said:
Yeah, @Greg Bernhardt, I was confused by the name too, before reading about them and discovering what mfb posted here. It DOES seem odd that they are called "rare" Earth's but aren't rare. :smile:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_earth_element
Wikipedia said:
They are not especially rare, but they tend to occur together in nature and are difficult to separate from one another.
I couldn't resist:
http://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2012-06-17
:biggrin:
 
  • #11
What about unhexquadium? It's only theoretical so nobody knows it's real properties, and it's pretty far beyond human's capabilities for the next several decades at least.
 
  • #12
It sounds like what you're looking for is a real material, that you can attach some technobabble to. I would humbly suggest the element Technetium. It has the following qualities that make it good for science fiction:

1 - It's a naturally occurring element - it's a metal that can be part of a number of different molecules.
2 - it is unique in that it is the lightest element that has nothing but radioactive isotopes - where present in the universe, it decays away. It's longest half-life is 4.2 million years. It's found on rocky bodies only where uranium or molybdenum are present, and then in very tiny amounts.
3 - Because it is not common on Earth, if it has any spooky and fictional properties that would make it good for your story, we might not have found out about them yet, just by sheer luck of not having ever subjected the material to that kind of testing.
4 - It's been found in space - large stars produce it; it's in supernova remnants. You could argue that the industry of mining the stuff and interstellar exploration, went hand in hand.
 
  • #13
Greg Bernhardt said:
What about Iridium? Nice name I think.

I like the idea of iridium just because it is the geological marker for the dinosaur killing impactor, low these many 65 million (or so) years ago.
 
  • #14
Some times even now new alloys are found with interesting properties
Just think about what weird things plane old iron can do
 
  • #15
How about Promethium? It's very rare, as all of its isotopes are unstable, but it exists on Earth as a natural product of the decay of Uranium and Europium. It can even be synthesized by bombarding Uranium with neutrons. So you'd have to acquire this rare, radioactive material from another radioactive material and the only way to get more than trace amounts is to use neutrons from yet more radioactive material!
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #16
Unobtainium.
 
  • #17
Kryptonite. Dilithium. Cavorite. Mithril. Ice-nine. Scrith. Upsadasium.

From a pure storytelling point of view, I see no advantage to using a real material and giving it properties it is not known to have and using a fictional material. I think the former is even more distracting.
 
  • #18
Vanadium 50 said:
Kryptonite. Dilithium. Cavorite. Mithril. Ice-nine. Scrith. Upsadasium.

From a pure storytelling point of view, I see no advantage to using a real material and giving it properties it is not known to have and using a fictional material. I think the former is even more distracting.
Yep. Nobody can refute claims ascribed to handwavium. And there might be a rock out there in the Oort Cloud that is made of pure unobtainium. It could be headed this way right now.
 
  • #19
Hmm. I haven't been getting email updates to everyone's posts, so my apologies for not responding sooner. I'll look into some of the elements suggested here. Unobtanium is a favorite of mine. :-)
 
  • #20
dbaezner said:
Hmm. I haven't been getting email updates to everyone's posts, so my apologies for not responding sooner. I'll look into some of the elements suggested here. Unobtanium is a favorite of mine. :-)
It's one of those where you can mention people who have speculated on it as if they had been able to follow through.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
611
  • Poll Poll
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top