Rate Law for IBr Decomposition: Explained Step-by-Step

AI Thread Summary
The proposed mechanism for IBr decomposition involves a fast initial step producing I and Br, followed by a slow step that forms Br2. The rate law is determined by the slowest step, leading to an initial rate equation of rate = k[IBr][Br]. Since Br is an intermediate, it is replaced with a function of IBr, resulting in the modified rate law of rate = k'[IBr]^2. This reflects the dependency on the concentration of IBr, confirming that the overall rate law is second order with respect to IBr. Understanding these steps clarifies how the rate law is derived from the reaction mechanism.
jupiter_8917
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Write the rate law for the following proposed mechanism for the decomposition of IBr to I2 and Br2.

IBr(g)---------->I(g) + Br(g) (fast)
IBr(g) + Br(g)-------->I(g) + Br2(g) (slow)
I(g) + I(g)--------->I2(g) (fast)

The answer is R=k[IBr]^2. I don't know where this answer comes from. Can anyone please explain it to me step by step? Thank you for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We know that for an elementary reaction step, the rate is proportional to the product of the molar concentrations of each reactant.
For a reaction with a multi-step mechanism, the rate of the reaction is dependent on the rate of limiting step ie the slowest step. In this case here it is the 2nd step. So, we have a preliminary rate equation:
rate = k[IBr][Br]​

However, it does not make any sense to have an intermediate in the rate equation, so we replace [Br] with the reactant(s) that form it. Since the reaction IBr(g)----->I(g) + Br(g) occurs rapidly, [Br] is clearly a fraction of [IBr]. And thus we replace [Br] with h[IBr] where h is a constant to obtain
rate = k'[IBr]^2​
where k' denotes a modified rate constant.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top