Ratio of Kinetic Energy lost in a collision.

AI Thread Summary
In collisions, the distance traveled during contact is indeed the same for both objects, leading to equal work done but opposite in direction. The energy lost during a collision manifests as heat, sound, and deformation. There is no fixed ratio of kinetic energy lost for each object; it varies based on the specific circumstances of the collision. For instance, when two shells filled with water collide, the kinetic energy loss ratio changes depending on whether the water is frozen in one or both shells. The conversion of kinetic energy into internal energy complicates the ratio further, demonstrating that it is context-dependent.
Yuqing
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
For collisions wouldn't the distance traveled during the collision be the same? The energy lost is from heat, sound, deformation, etc. but wouldn't the work done on each car be the same since during the duration of contact they have to move the same distance (as soon as they move different distances they are no longer in contact) and apply the opposite but equal force?

So is there a set ratio of kinetic energy lost for each object? If not, can anyone give me an example where the force is applied over different distances for a collision because I can't think of any examples.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mostly correct. The magnitude of the work done on car A by car B is the same as the magnitude of the work done on B by A. Their signs are opposite because the directions of the forces that do the work are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. That's s clear loss of energy by one object and gain by the other. However, the ratio is not set but depends on the object. For example, consider two colliding shells partilly filled with water. The ratio of kinetic energy lost will vary depending on if the water is frozen in both balls, or in only one ball or in none. When some of the kinetic energy is converted into internal energy, the ratio depends on the specifics.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top