Ratio Problem Dealing with Radius and Centripetal Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
Two identical satellites orbit the Earth, with one traveling at a speed v and the other at a lower speed. The relationship between orbital radius (r) and speed (v) is crucial, as centripetal acceleration (a) is defined by the equation a = v^2/r. A slower speed for the second satellite implies a larger orbital radius, aligning with Kepler's Laws regarding stable orbits. The discussion highlights confusion around manipulating gravitational and centripetal force equations, particularly in understanding the implications of stable orbits. Clarifying these concepts is essential for solving the problem effectively.
PeachBanana
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two identical satellites orbit the Earth in stable orbits. One satellite orbits with a speed v at a distance r from the center of the earth. The second satellite travels at a speed that is less than v . At what distance from the center of the Earth does the second satellite orbit?


Homework Equations


a = (v)^2/r
F = m/a
F = G (M * m )/ r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm really confused on how to manipulate these equations.

Ultimately, I need to find an equation that relates "r" to "v."
r = a * v^2
So if the second satellite is moving slower doesn't that mean "r" has to be bigger? This makes me think of one of Kepler's Laws.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F = m/a
That should read F=ma or a=F/m

What does satellites orbit the Earth in stable orbits tell you about the system?
I'm not sure you understand what you're actually doing when you're working with these equations
 
Wow. That was really careless of me. When it comes to problems like these, I don't understand how to do them well. Stable orbits = equal gravitational force?
 
What should the gravitational force equal?

What does it mean if the orbit is stable?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top