Rayleigh-scattering and dipole Common characters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stylewriter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole
AI Thread Summary
Rayleigh scattering in X-rays involves the change in direction of X-rays without energy loss, primarily due to interactions with dipoles. This scattering occurs when the wavelength of the radiation is greater than the size of the dipole, allowing the dipole to oscillate in an electric field and scatter the X-rays in various directions. The strength of the scattered wave increases with frequency, explaining phenomena like the blue sky. The discussion emphasizes that Rayleigh scattering is a classical effect, and its principles do not apply when quantum effects become significant. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the relationship between Rayleigh scattering and dipoles.
Stylewriter
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello!

This time I've got a question about the "Rayleigh-scattering" in X-Rays.
The Rayleigh-scattering says, that the x-ray changes it direction only without "loosing" energy.
Why does this happen and what has it to do with dipoles? My university professor told me, that the Rayleigh-scattering has something to do with dipoles.
I can't find anything in books about that. I hope you could help me, that I can understand this problem.
Thanks a lot!
 
Science news on Phys.org
There are several types of diffusion of em.radiation on matter particles,even in the classical theory of electromagnetism.

Rayleigh diffusion,treated thoroughly in Jackson's book,indeed assumes the variation of the wave vector only in direction,and not in modulus.

Daniel.
 
It is because Lord Rayleigh considered scattering on small dipoles. The power emmitted by dipole is proportional to the frequency^4, so the scattered wave becames stronger at highier frequencies (that is why the sky is blue)
 
I am not sure if I understand this... If we've got an atom like H and we firing x-ray at it, does it then oscillate (like a dipole) and scatters the x-ray into another direction? And in WHAT direction?
Am I totally wrong with that? ;)
 
First of all, the Rayleigh scattering takes places when wavelength is greater then the dipole size. So not any X-ray scattering on atoms can be considered in that approximation.

Second, if a wavelength of the X-ray radiation is bigger then the dipole size, we can assume that the dipole is under an oscillating electric field, thus it oscillates itself. The combination of original wave and the wave due to dipole radiation produces the scattering, because the dipole does not radiate flat wave. So instead of original flat wave we have waves propagating in different directions.

Third, I did not say anything about quantum. That was done deliberately, because it the the nature of the Rayleigh approximation, it is a classical effect. The mechanism will be no longer valid if quantum effects are important.
 
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
Thread 'How to model converging illumination through object plane (in ZEMAX)'
Hello community, I'm designing a projection lens system for a 35mm film projector in Zemax OpticStudio and struggling with the correct sequential mode setup for the illumination geometry. The light source is a Xenon short-arc lamp reflected by an ellipsoid mirror, which creates a converging cone with a 40.6 degree full angle that passes through the film gate. The film gate is my object plane, but the light doesn't diverge from it like a typical Lambertian source. Instead, the converging...
Back
Top