I Rayleigh scattering and reversibility

J O Linton
Messages
77
Reaction score
11
TL;DR
Is Rayleigh scattering a reversible process?
In many books and websites the elastic (Rayleigh) scattering of low energy photons off an atom is stated as being reversible. It seems to me that it is a mistake to think that all elastic processes are reversible. If a process is reversible it should be possible to calculate the initial state of the system given the final state. This is not the case with RS because the emitted photon can be emitted in any direction at random so there is no way of calculating the direction it was originally moving in.
If RS is an irreversible process then it would provide the ideal candidate for the random element which is required to explain the success of Boltzmann's statistical theory of gases and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Is there something wrong with this argument?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I should have thought that a single scattering particle acts as a dipole re-radiator, so if we know its geometry and orientation, then the characteristics of the scattered wave can be calculated. I am not sure that Rayleigh scattering is necessarily a quantum process as it can occur with long wavelengths and correspondingly large objects - the attenuation between source and detector will be the same in both directions (Rayleigh-Carson law of reciprocity) and so is reversible. Of course, no optical system of source-detector if operated with single photons can be predicted from moment-to-moment and so is non reversible.
 
A relative asked me about the following article: Experimental observation of a time rondeau crystal https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-025-03028-y I pointed my relative to following article: Scientists Discovered a Time Crystal That Reveals a New Way to Order Time https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/scientists-discovered-time-crystal-reveals-180055389.html This area is outside of my regular experience. I'm interested in radiation effects in polycrystalline material, i.e., grain...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
19K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K