RC Circ, Capacitor charging Q....very lost

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving an RC circuit problem involving a 2.0 μF capacitor and resistors in series and parallel configurations. The user incorrectly assumed the capacitor had zero resistance, leading to erroneous calculations of current and voltage drops across components. The correct approach involves using the charging capacitor equation, I = I_0 e^{-t/RC}, and understanding the voltage divider principle to determine the voltage across the capacitor. The user is advised to remove the capacitor to find the steady-state voltage across the circuit components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of RC circuits and capacitor charging equations
  • Familiarity with series and parallel resistor configurations
  • Knowledge of voltage divider principles
  • Basic proficiency in logarithmic functions for circuit analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the charging capacitor equation in detail, focusing on time constants
  • Learn about voltage dividers and their applications in circuit analysis
  • Explore the concept of steady-state conditions in DC circuits
  • Practice solving RC circuit problems with varying resistor and capacitor values
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, circuit designers, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of RC circuits and capacitor behavior in DC applications.

kostoglotov
Messages
231
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



v1zBOJd.png


Homework Equations



Series: R_{eq} = R_1 + ... + R_n

Parallel: R_{eq} = \left(\frac{1}{R_1} + ... + \frac{1}{R_n} \right)^{-1}

Charging Capacitor: I = I_0 e^{-t/RC}

Charging Capacitor: \Delta V_C = \varepsilon (1- e^{-t/RC})

Charge: Q = C \Delta V_C

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm really not sure how to approach this. I know that the approach I've taken neither agrees with the answer in the back and doesn't make much logical sense in terms of everything else I know.

I made an assumption (a bad one I'm guessing) to treat, at least at first, the whole circuit like a parallel/series resistors problem to find the overall current through the circuit and then the voltage drops across the various components, in an attempt to find the voltage drop across the capacitor. The only problem with doing it that way is that the R_{eq} across the circuit could be calculated to be 68 ohm (assuming the cap. is a 0 ohm component...I know, probably a very wrong assumption), which puts 1.5 Amp through the circuit overall, giving a 90 Volt drop across the first resistor, leaving 10 Volts to do work on the remaining components in parallel. But then if you continue from there, turns out the 40 Ohm resistor gets 0.25 amps, the resistor/capacitor combo should be getting 1.25 Amps, which puts a 12.5 Volt drop across the 10 Ohm resistor, which is too high.

What do I need to do to solve this problem? Do I need to use those logarithmic functions? How? Are there cut off points for how much voltage will get through that 10 Ohm resistor and onto the capacitor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a DC circuit, when you want to find the steady state voltage across capacitors, remove the capacitors from the circuit and find the potential across the open terminals where they were connected.

In this case, remove the 2.0 μF capacitor and find the potential between the open end of the 10 Ω resistor and the bottom node.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kostoglotov
An equivalent way of looking at it is to realize that no current flows through the 10 ohm resistor (as long as the switch has been closed, or open for that matter, for a long time).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kostoglotov
Note that this part of the circuit ...

Voltage Divider.png


is called a "voltage divider". It essentially "divides" the voltage supplied by the battery, so that only a part of it is available to something connected across points A and B. By varying the sizes of the two resistors the voltage between points A and B can be varied to anything between zero and 100 V.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K