RC circuit black box circuit modeling

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a mystery box containing resistors of varying ohm values, where measurements between terminals yield puzzling resistance values. The user struggles to model the circuit correctly, questioning how to incorporate the 200,000 ohm resistor while achieving the measured values of 60k, 140k, and 120k ohms. There is confusion regarding whether the resistor values are in ohms or kilohms, as the measurements suggest higher resistance than expected. Participants suggest using circuit diagrams for clarity and propose exploring a T or delta model to analyze the resistances. Overall, there is a consensus that additional information or clarification may be needed to solve the problem effectively.
CookieSalesman
Messages
103
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


I have a red mystery box which contains a 20, 50, 100, and 200,000 ohm resistor (one of each and ONLY one.)

There are three terminals on the box you can plug a voltmeter into... testing A-B I got 60k, testing A-C I got 140k, and testing B-C I get 120k ohms. So this is a bit of a puzzle.

I'm aware of general and relevant equations.

The Attempt at a Solution


I really struggle with this for some reason. It's been a while with RC circuits.

These are pretty large values and it means that no matter what two places you pick, at least some of the current must flow through the 200K ohm resistor I think. Ok I think I can do this... it seems I need to somehow reduce the resistance of the 200,000 ohm resistor by some percentage. But I DO NOT know how to do this without either making the resistance JUST a flat 60 ohms for instance, or I either just make a map so that I get 200,050 ohms...

I tried thinking of something like... starting with the 200K resistor, then as you move along the circuit splits to a parallel junction with 20 and 50. The junction does not connect back to one line. One end leads off from the 20, and another end leaves from the 50 ohm resistor for instance. This sort of arrangement looked good for a moment but the thing is I think that "current" or whatever is measured won't pass through the other resistor at the parallel junction, right!?? So that just becomes 200,020 or 200,050 ohms and it just adds...
I was hoping that for instance if the 20-50 junction came back together, I think I could feasibly squeeze out the right values 60k 140k and 120k if you measured immediately after the 20 or 50 ohm resistor, and before it came back together.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is this an RC circuit? It contains resistors only, no capacitors.

Are you sure that the 20, 50, and 100 values are Ohms and not k Ohms? I don't see how it would be possible to have all measured results above 170 Ω, let alone in the kΩ range otherwise. Unless it's your measurements that are not correctly scaled?

Rather than describing circuits in text form it would be much better to post sketches of your ideas. A circuit diagram conveys information more efficiently without the possibility of misinterpretation.
 
I see what you mean. Maybe the resitances are 20kohm 50kohm and so. Anyway I would try first to work with a t or delta model to see which values of recistance I get. Still I think there is something missing in the problem statement.
 
Ohhhhhhhhhhhh you might be right there...

This may just be stupidly lazy TA's at work... I spent an hour trying these diagrams.

Thanks both.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top