Re: favourite classic series

  • Thread starter Schrodinger's Dog
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Series
In summary, Mind Your Language is about the importance of communication and the negative effects of not using proper language.
  • #1
Schrodinger's Dog
835
7
In honour of the fact that I inadvertantly threadjacked Wolrams Fall guy thread, oops. And the fact that I love old classics: what is your favourite old series, from any era, show your age; let's hear about some of those goofy loveable oldies, that now exist either as re-runs or on DVD.

I'm going to put up a starter, feel free to indulge your most obscure reminiscences.:smile:

Blakes Seven.

"[URL

The series was created by Terry Nation, who had previously worked on Doctor Who and created the Doctor's most famous adversaries, the Daleks. It was made in the United Kingdom and was produced and broadcast by the BBC. Blake's 7 resembled other BBC science fiction shows (such as Doctor Who), but was characterised by a darker tone and often defied the traditional sharply-defined ethical stances associated with this type of drama, with considerable blurring of the distinction between the "good" and the "bad" guys (and gals).

Loosely based on the Robin Hood legend, the show followed the exploits of a group of outlaw revolutionaries, led by a patriot-hero named Roj Blake (Gareth Thomas), who fought the fascist interstellar Terran Federation in the second century of the third calendar. Blake's 7 was watched by 10 million viewers at its peak, an enormous number for a space opera.

The show is noted for its strong focus on character; Blake and his band of outlaws were all highly individual, distinctive, and flawed, as often at each others' throats and in pursuit of their own private agendas as they were facing down their common enemies in the Federation. It also featured a remarkable attrition rate among its main characters, in violation of accepted practice for a drama of its nature. Unlike many mainstream TV dramas, the morally ambiguous or evil characters (specifically, Avon and the ruthless but charismatic Servalan) proved to be the most interesting, and both soon gathered dedicated fan followings.

http://www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~rmb/allb7.html

EDIT:http://www.freewebs.com/mypicturesandsht/746px%2DB7cast%5Fs2.jpg"
From left to right: Gan, Cally, Blake, Villa, Avon, Jenna. Zen is not shown.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1987)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teenage_Mutant_Ninja_Turtles#1987_animated_series

and, uh... Rainbow Brite and the Star Stealer. (1985)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_Brite_and_the_Star_StealerI'm thinking the former was about the technological economy meeting evolutionary biology ("Do you like penicillin on your pizza?") and the latter was about the impossibility of defeating light in a race via the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Hey, if time stands still for photons, so too for Rainbow Brite.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Yes Minister & Yes, Prime Minister. I don't think there's ever been a better series.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yes_Minister"

Mind Your Langauge :biggrin:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_Your_Language"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is considered a "classic" series in the scientific community?

A classic series in science refers to a body of work that has stood the test of time and has made significant contributions to a particular field of study. These series are often considered foundational and serve as a basis for further research and discoveries.

2. What makes a series a favorite among scientists?

There are a few factors that can contribute to a series being a favorite among scientists. This can include the accuracy and reliability of the data presented, the clarity and organization of the information, and the impact the series has had on the scientific community.

3. Are there any classic series that have been disproven or outdated by newer research?

Yes, it is common for classic series to be updated or even disproven as new research and technology become available. This is a natural part of the scientific process, and it is important for scientists to continually reassess and revise their understanding of a particular topic.

4. How can I access classic series for my own research?

Many classic series are available through academic databases or online archives. It is also helpful to consult with a librarian or research specialist who can assist in locating specific series or relevant resources for your research.

5. Can classic series be used as evidence in scientific debates?

Yes, classic series can be used as evidence in scientific debates, but it is important to also consider more recent research and advancements in the field. It is also crucial to critically evaluate the methods and conclusions of the series being used as evidence.

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top